Talk:DarkMetal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DarkMetal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
MMOG logo This article is within the scope of WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of massively multiplayer online games. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.


This article follows in the foot steps of other popular, MUSH related articles, including: FiranMUX and Cajun Nights.

[edit] Hands Off?

"Hands-off by the staff" was not my comment, but it seems odd to be there. DM was never entirely a hands-off game and certainly at the start staff had as much of an influence in the game as powerful or promenant PCs. (This was by design.) Perhaps what this line originally intended to mean was that staff did not invent or force people into "tiny plots" of their own devising; staff typically acted as resources in this regard. It is long-standing player contention, though, that staff with major PC characters means they are even less hands-off than that as they can easily manipulate the game with staff-granted abilities. I could cite quite a few references if anything about Mushing leant toward anything to cite, but the number of times DM's staff have, over its very long lifetime, used their position to force situations to happen is probably quite high. Therefore, the term "hands-off by the staff" should be stricken or clarified. For now, I'm striking it. -- Thenomain (blah blah original DM wizard blah blah)

Glad to see that comment stricken. Having played DM and other MU*s, it was entirely unclear to me what it meant. I wonder if it was originally inserted as some sort of commentary, as I had struck a portion of the sentence which said the "hands off policy" was largely ignored. (WTF?) Anyway, yes... unless explained or sourced, I don't think it should be put back in. croll 22:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion recently. The result of the discussion was keep.