User talk:Danianjan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Jawaharlal Nehru

You added the following to the article:

The details of Nehru's birth are controversial as he was born in an area that is currently the red light district, which implies that Nehru was probably born out of illicit sexual relations of his father with a prostitute.

Did you really think that conclusion was reached from the article you cited?

I've reverted your changes. Please don't add statements like this to articles in the future.

-- Samir धर्म 15:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Zero mile.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zero mile.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not continue to upload pictures licensed on a non-commercial basis only without providing a valid fair use rationale. Wikipedia cannot accept them, as there are many commercial reusers of our content. Thanks. theProject 21:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why Image:Zero mile.jpg is not allowed here

Jimbo Wales himself stated that images that do not allow commercial use that are uploaded after May 19, 2005 must be speedily deleted in this post in the Wikipedia mailing list. The GFDL, which is the license that Wikipedia licenses its material under, requires that such material be able to be used for commercial purposes. Creative Commons licensed files used on Wikipedia must allow commercial use and derivatives to be allowed here. Jesse Viviano 14:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

Hello. Please refrain from questioning another user's mental capacity, as you did at Talk:Shiv Sena. Also please see WP:NPA. Thankyou.Blnguyen | rant-line 02:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for calling another user a "bigot" at Talk:Shiv Sena.Blnguyen | rant-line 04:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good work with the Mumbain blasts article

Joturner, Good work for moving the statements to a separate article, but you should have left some more international statements in the main article. --Wikindian 22:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. You are, of course, free to add more international statements to the main article. -- joturner 02:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nagpur

You expressed your views on the organisational flaws of the Nagpur article. The article has now been nominated for the Indian collaboration of the week - please vote for the improvement of the article by signing your name and updating the number of votes under the Nagpur section. Thanks - Sfacets 12:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] India Links

Here are a few India realated links you might be interested in:

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content

Welcome kit

Register

Network

Contribute content

Cheers, and happy editing! -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK17:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nagpur

Hi, thanks for your feedback on my contribution. There is no official definition of what a geographical center is. I would like you to take a look at this article: [1] for further information. My view is that since only factual information should be presented, we'll need to find out what the concensus among the scientific community is regarding geographical centers. Could you please let me know what sites you've referenced regarding the geographical center of India? Cheers. ray 09:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shiv Sena

I just don't support a party which goes on rampage, and obtains its goals by illegal, and criminal violence on the street

So you're against Hamas, Fatah, Lashkar-e-Toiba,Hezbollah, D-Company, Christian Identity Movement, Irgun, Lehy,Meir Kahane, The Russian Mafia in New York,Yasser Arafat? I'll bet not. I'll bet you love at least some of these goons. Anything to defame Hindus with balls, right?(Netaji 11:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC))

My point is that you (presumably an Indian) lambast and demonize Hindu activists who fight for the rights of Hindus against the aggression of Islam and the duplicity of Christianity, try to protect our society and culture , preserve our identity , heritage and values, fight for our right to a Hindu India, and speak out against the most heinous atrocities committed against Hindus all over the subcontinent and elsewhere while the liberal socialist Indian government and Indian media fawn over in praise of muslim terrorists and muslim gangsters and espouse hatred for their own people. Yet I'm sure you don't have any problems with terrorists who attack Hindus with boulders and bombs. I'll bet you've been dancing on the streets of Allahabad together with muslims after they bombed our trains, right? You're the classic example of the self-hating Indian; who consorts with alien Mohammedians who'd cheerfully slit your throat at a moment's notice if their local mullah orders them to do so. Think about THAT and hang your head in shame!Netaji 20:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I was being melodramatic in order to illustrate a point. You need to take a long term view of this situation instead of a myopic one. Remember that the United States and Australia were founded by 'criminal elements' and 'thugs' and now they are among the world's most advanced countries. Sometimes, there's nothing like some good-old fashioned aggression to rid us of a viral element.Netaji 22:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The SS dumped it's whole 'maharashtra is for marathas' nonsense decades ago. Move with the times. SS is a nationalist party, advocating Indian Patriotism. Sure, they can be a bit overzealous at times. I'm surprised that you, as a maratha, don't seem to understand the fundamentals of Maratha romanticism. The SS are a romantic party, and exhibit the romantic passion that comes with it. As for criminality, bear in mind the irony of being criminalized by a liberal socialist congress-UPA. Socialism is the biggest crime in human history! The SS has provided Marathas with a strong vioce and a hardlined stance. They are the first, last and pretty much the only line of defense against muslim gangs like D-Company and their terrorist buddies. It is only after UPA defanged them that these terrorist attacks happened. Netaji 23:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I can't comment on Thackeray's alleged attacks on UP'ites because I haven't heard of it. Provide me with a reference to a news item and I'll read it. I'm not saying that the SS is perfect. Many of their actions are worthy of intense criticism. However, to use a few isolated incidents quoted out of context in order to defame and denigrate a party with a (basically) sound foundational ideology is being terribly biased in my opinion. Also, in case you have forgotten history, 'short-sighted maratha regionalists' like the first Chatrapati Shivaji Raje Bhonsle was responsible for creating the first modern confederacy in India and resisting the barbaric Mohammadean hordes from the Mughal Empire. 'Short Sighted Maratha regionalists' like Laxmibai put up the last significant resistance to British Imperial aggression in the region. I'm sure that Afzal Khan, Shahista Khan and Siddi Jauhar thought of Shivaji as you think of Thackeray, and look what that got them! What about that? Do you think his enemies would think so ill of him after the fact. History will judge SS and Thackeray, not you.Netaji 23:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and 'Hitlerian'????? What's with this Godwin's law crap? Hitlerian! Last time I checked, there were no concentration camps in Maharashtra. so he said that he admires Hitler. So does Arnold Schwartzenegger, governor of California and of Austrian birth. What's your point anyway. Don't make hyperbolic statements.Netaji 00:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
There are many historians who have lambasted Shivaji as you have Thackeray. I don't remember specifics, but I believe there was an incident with an anti-Shivaji book and the Sambhaji Brigade in Pune. I await your reference with bated breath Netaji 00:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I never said that YOU lambasted the Chhatrapati. Don't put words in my mouth. I said that your screed against Thackeray mirrors that against Shivaji made by many white historians as part of a Macauley-ist agenda of racial and cultural defamation. Shivaji was 'just another random thug' to them, as Thackeray seems to be to you. Bear in mind that Balasaheb Thackeray is widely admired in Maharashtra. Plus, I wasn't aware that Thackeray made any comments that pointed to a belief in any 'inherent ethnic superiority' of Maharashtrians like Hitler , Hess or Rosenberg did with regards to their 'Herrenvolk'. The difference between them and Balasaheb is that Balasaheb spoke out in defense of Hindus against Islamic atrocities. At worst, Thackeray's previous stance against non-Maharashtrians (which I believe he has abandoned) can be called 'nativist', which is drastically different from 'Fascist' or 'Hitlerian'. Thackeray's ideology is that of defending our right to a Hindu Rashtra. In that sense, he is more like Ariel Sharon than Hitler, as Ariel Sharon defends the Jewish right to a Jewish State in Israel. Significant difference, see? Netaji 18:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I read the article supplied to me by that Haphar fellow on SS 'attacking' Northerners. Here's my take on it:

You implicitly claim that they attacked UP/Bihar'ites because of their ethnicity or because of an inherent belief that they have about Maratha superiority. But the article does not indicate that any such belief system was behind these altercations. The claim of the SS is quite legitimate, that they want preferential representation for local Marathas in Railway positions in Maharashtra. Granted, their TACTICS are a bit questionable, bit their IDEOLOGY is still legitimate and sound. There is no logic behind your going on a polemical rant accusing SS of Fascism since nothing in their ideology reflects any Fascism. Like I said, the best criticism of their ideology is NATIVIST, NOT FASCIST OR HITLERIAN!!!!!

Shivsena is not anti non-Maratha but it does support Marathas, albeit a bit aggressively. Everyone should understand the difference between these two. Shivsena did not assault Biharis because of their ethnicity but they advocated for Marathas. To save the Marathas it was necessary to send Beharis back. If the government, in a fit of gutter multiculturalism, chooses to short-change the Marathas, then the Marathas need to respond actively. You are looking at SS from a left-wing liberal lens, marred by self-loathing and negationist pacifism.

On the face of it their actions looks very abnormal but if you see the situation from the point of view of working-class Maratha sentimentality then you would perhaps sympathize with their methods. Besides, these are just minor spats that eventually blow over. a compromise is reached and all is well. I've lived in Mumbai for the better part of 15 years and I can assure you that the SS is not the roving gang of maniacal skinhead-esque thugs that the sensationalist media portrays it to be. Netaji 22:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Here is the Haphar fellows response to the Neta/Subhash chappie on his talk page[2] Haphar 11:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Er, I am not a Maratha (I'm Bengali), so I'm not biased in favor of them at all.Nor am I a 'maratha-con-sena' regionalist. Marathas who wish nativism are a large group with no voice here. Wikipedia is supposed to 'reflect the world', right (see a post above or below)? What abut the world of the maratha? While I would not want a Shiv Sainik in my back yard, I do admire their resolve and their core ideology. Plus, why shouldn't the Marathas get preferential treatment in Maharashtra when Texan residents in Texas get preferential treatment in universities (less tuition) over non Texan residents. There is a lot of preference for in-state people wrt jobs in the US over out-of-state people, even though a majority of the top people in Austin are non-Texans. SS wants the same thing in Maharashtra, that's all Netaji 16:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, all states do have them. All US states prioritize their residents in jobs and fees over non-residents. That is what SS wants for Maharashtra. Let other parties in other states implement the same laws. SS is concerned only with Maharashtra bcoz they are a Maratha party. Just because I'm a Bengali you automatically assume I'm a rabid commie who hates SS is an example of your stereotyping. You have no idea how much I intelsely loath CPI(M),WB government in general and that fool Buddadeb Bhattacharya. Your last post is rather incoherent I'm afraid. It does not legitimately refute my points but deflects the argument with irrelevant information.Netaji 17:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I am against the left simply because they have dragged our country into the mud and have destroyed our economy with 5-year plans and cooperative industry. They are trying to eradicate Hindus and create an Islamic theocracy by mollycoddling the muslim vote bank.
The Sena can advocate non-Marathas to leave Maharashtra all they want. Never gonna happen. Their advocating it is therefore irrelevant. Their workable ideology is to create a Hindu Rashtra, which IS going to happen. Either that, or India will be further partitionedNetaji 18:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I saw your "personal" views about wikipedia. Please come, and try to up-date the pages. Thanks. --Bhadani 16:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes. Fine. Have a nice time and enjoy building the Project. --Bhadani 17:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bal Thackeray

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

No. I'm warning you that if you delete edits without reason and start a revert war then you will be forced to violate 3RR and get banned (do the math, my 3rd revert will come after yours)Netaji 05:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been dangerously close to making veiled personal attacks. I warn you again to maintain a civil tone.Netaji 18:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning to YOU as well

If YOU deterioriate to ad-Hoiminem attacks against myself then I will try to block YOU as well. Remain civil and there will be no problems.Netaji 21:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

On more than one occasion, you have resorted to using veiled epithets and minced oaths. I am more honest, is all.Netaji 22:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Threats and intimidation tactics won't work with me. I had that Anwar saadat chap put down, who was far worse than you.Netaji 22:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I am sorry but your comments here need moderation indeed.

Lkadvani 22:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Uncivil and insulting behaviour on Hindutva Talk Page

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars.

Make pejorative remarks again and I'll report you for violating civility. Keep a courteous tone at all times or you will meet Wikisceptic's fate. Clear?Netaji 11:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reporting YOU

My dear Sir. I am reporting YOU to for your most recent posts as well.Netaji 18:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Revert Nobleeagle's NPOV edits and I will revert them back.Netaji 18:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fixed Shiv Sena

I fixed the errorNetaji 01:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I support Nobleeagle's edits (except for the grammatical errors). Threats won't work against me anymore Netaji 01:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Lodged complaint for personal attacks.Netaji 02:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not try to incite edit wars. [3].Thanks, Blnguyen | rant-line 02:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

What the heck? I edited once on 8/6/06 and twice on 8/8/06. I deleted your warning as you do not have the proper justification.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Concerning Shiv Sena

Hello! I have come to your user talk page because of a request posted on Request for Investigation which I know you are aware of. Due to our large backlog, I apologize for the amount of time it took to get a response from us. After reading the entire conversation on WP:RFI, I have come to the conclusion that you are violating WP:OWN. By contributing to Wikipedia, you are allowing your submission to be openly edited by anyone else who so wishes. Reverting the contributions without first engaging in discussion to find out why that change was made is a step in the wrong direction and can lead to an edit war and/or WP:RFI and further. (WP:RFI can refer cases to WP:RFC if the percieved "vandalism" or another user turns into an edit war.) Thanks. --ZsinjTalk 22:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


Dude, I noticed that there are a number of FU images on your userpage. I'm afraid this violates the FU policy - you'll have to remove them. Rama's arrow 16:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FU=Fair use

Hi, I just noticed your question on Rama's Arrow's page. Since he has not answered it yet, I thought I might do it. FU (or fair use) images are those that are uploaded to wikipedia only to clarify the subject that they describe. You cannot use fair use images elsewhere as that would be "unfair" use. You can see more on Wikipedia:Fair use -- Lost(talk) 07:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration

Hello, you are involved in a request for arbitration. Please see this case. TerryJ-Ho 02:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 12:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar

This case is now closed and the results have been posted above.

For the Arbitration committee, Cowman109Talk 06:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:060214 antivalentines vlrg 5a.widec.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:060214 antivalentines vlrg 5a.widec.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 05:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/a/n/User_talk%7EDanianjan_57c4.html"