User talk:Dan027
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dan027. |
| This is the User talk page for Dan027, where you can send messages and comments to Dan027. |
|
|
|
| 1 2 |
Contents |
[edit] Claxton Shield 2007
Thanks for updating the article for the 2007 Claxton Shield. Good work. --Borgarde 16:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers mate. in the near future im going to change all the previous claxton shield articles to the same layout as this one, and finish off the remaining ABL seasons. --Dan027 11:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry, but blink-182 isn't pop-punk.
- Ive notice you continauly keep changing the bands genre from pop punk to punk rock and the opening paragraph to imply that the band is active, neither of these are the consensus that was reached on the articles talk page, please raise the issue there in future making, these changes to the article again can be considered vandalism. --Dan027 02:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey bro,
First of all, there was no consensus on the talk page at all.
Second, what you are doing can be tagged as vandalism as well.
Third, I started a new topic about it on blink- 182's talk page. You should look at what I wrote.
We're both blink fans, and that's cool, so lets come to an agreement over this topic.
And it should be "is" not "was". They took a break in 2002 also, when Tom formed Boxcar Racer. Just cause they're a little more pissed at eachother this time around doesn't mean the band has ceased to exist. It's a hiatus, not a break-up. If you look on Pink Floyd's page, it says "is" even though they are on a hiatus and have been for MANY years. Just leave it as "is" and "punk rock".
By the way, I think it's a little wierd that your profile says that you "like real punk rock and can't stand pop-punk" yet it also says you "love blink-182". So by that rationalle, you should want to classify them as "punk rock" and not "pop-punk".
Care to explain?
--Hawkypunk 07:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- the consensus on the page was reached here[1].
- well by posting somthing on your talk page it brought the issue away from an edit war, thats hardly vandalism.
- in the article it says Years active 1992 – 2005 (on hiatus), meaning the band is not active, which correct english grammer would have the article in past tense(was) and not present tense(is).
- just for you ill take that user box off, would you like it instead ;) we are both blink fans im sure a resonable agreement can be reached between us. cheers mate --Dan027 11:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Excellent contributions
Hi, lots of contributions. Well done. Do beware of "Compeating", I'm pretty sure there is no "A" and it occurs quite often. Victuallers 17:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cheers mate, one day i will remember there is no a, lol. --Dan027 07:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Australian Baseball League
Hey, just wondering if you've heard anymore news about the league starting up again. The source that is on the article doesn't exist anymore.. and I haven't heard much else. --Borgardetalk 11:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not recently, there was an article in one of West Australian papers in the last month or so stating preety much the same thing. ill ask around and see if i can find anymore out on it. --Dan027 11:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Rock music invitation
Hello WikiProject Alternative music member.
WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 03:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Werdnabot
Please note that per Werdna's own instructions, Werdnabot should not be used on article talk pages. Thanks – Qxz 04:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music and sources
As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 10:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
