Talk:Danielle Moonstar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uhm... Dani was never a member of the X-Men, was she?
And also... can't she project illusions of people's greatest fears and their greatest desires? Joeyconnick 00:07, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)
- On the X-Men point, I'm not sure. I know she was hanging about with the X-Men in the "Revolution" time period (c. X-Men 100-108), but I don't have those issues to check her exact status.
- She was briefly a member of the X-Men arount the "Revolution" timeframe, and also appeared in X-Men: Black Sun.
- On the illusions point, yeah, you're right and her powers (after one HELLavalot of screwing around with them) were reconfirmed as greatest fear/desire illusions in New Mutants v2 #2. SoM 00:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Revert War?
Can we NOT get into a revert war over this image, please? It looks like the original (nonprovocative) image of Dani Moonstar has been painstakingly rescanned by SOM. Given the level of effort this takes, I think you should at the very least put some discussion down before you just revert away the work, DrBat. Daniel Davis 00:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC) (Doom127)
- The other art is imo better, and it shows a clearer and better view of her face.--DrBat 00:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
You can see her whole face in both images. And Khary Randolph's work I wouldn't wish on a comic I wanted cancelled...
And, of course, I scanned the image myself, whereas using an image cribbed from a fansite can cause FU problems. - SoM 02:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- I've emailed the moderators a while ago, and they say its ok for me to use their image scans. The only images I need specific permission for are stuff like their fanart, ect.
- And despite saying how horriblt Khary's work is, you have yet to give any real reasons why.--DrBat 02:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
"Used with permission" is a reason to shoot on sight.
- What, do I need to show the email again like I did with that Deadpool image? --DrBat 20:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
And it's hugely stylised, with claws instead of fingers, weird faces and horrible anatomy. - SoM 20:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
I think we can keep this scan of Dani but still find one a little better that looks more like her. What do you think?
[edit] Afiliations?
How can she have "affiliations: none" but then a whole slew of groups she has been affiliated with. If at the current time she doesn't have any affiliations - the there needs to be "currently none" because to me the way it is now just doesn't look right. --Mr Vain 17:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)