Talk:Dani Evans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

She is so my role model i want yo be her!

SKS2K6 07:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm curious too? I'm confused. Peanutbuttercups 10:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Its definately Evans.

Where's a source for this, if it is certain? -- ArkansasTraveler 21:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

All the news articles as of late say "Danielle Evans has won ANTM".... SKS2K6 06:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


Well I think that Danielle really didn't deserve to win

I thought Danielle totally deserved to win.

[edit] Inappropriate Tone Tag

The current version of this page reads like a press kit biography. I am not going to get into a revert war, so I have instead tagged Evans' article. Elcda0 17:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PLEASE, Stop making this article brief!

Why does someone keep changing the article to make it smaller? Danielle deserves to have a great article, to match her great achievments, so stop trying to make her sound really unimportant and minor, because she isn't. This article needs to say and note her experiences and achievments in TopModel and after, and someone keeps on making it really brief. What is really mean, is that she won ANTM, and Joanie's is somewhat bigger and goes into greater detail, so why isn't anyone changing hers. Or is someone just changing Danielle's to make Joanie look more successful and notable? I don't mean to sound mean, rude and intruding, but Danielle just deserves more, so can you please just stop making it brief, I spent alot of time creating her article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.100.217.253 (talk • contribs).

I know it sucks when you spend a lot of time creating an article only to have it changed, but that's the whole point of Wikipedia; it's an encyclopedia anyone can edit. Also, it's important to make a biographical article on a living person sound as neutral and encyclopedic as possible - this current version just isn't. Frankly, it's a mess - in addition to the unsourced, POV information, there are grammatical errors as well. Elcda0 17:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photo?

I'm surprised there's no photo of her here, she won quite some time ago.