Talk:Dance of Death (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Was reading this page and noticed that Paschendale links to a wiki page so I decided to add a similar link by editing the Dance of Death (album) page with a link attached to Montsegur which links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathars

The reason I linked the Cathars page to Montsegur is simple if you understand the song Montsegur. But if you need this pointed out, then search on the Cathars page for "Mont" and you will find the following: " The repressive measures were terrible, in 1245, the royal officers assisting the Inquisition seized the heretical citadel of Montségur, and 200 Cathari were burned in one day." (quoted from the Cathars page on Wikipedia) There was no specific page for Montsegur so I decided to link to the Cathars page since it contains information relating to the song, though however brief it may be. Also notice on the Cathars page a book reference: "Montsegur and the Mystery of the Cathars, Jean Markale" --Demonslave 15:30, Apr 5, 2004 (UTC)

I removed the comment regarding the album cover. Even if ithe cover is ugly, the statement is still POV and quite unnecessary.

I disagree. It's relevant because, as I recall, it caused quite a ruckus online among the fanbase back then! - Stormwatch 17:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

The cover pic was and is widely criticized. Stating a fact is not POV, since that is obviously true. Stating that the cover pic sucks (which it did) is POV, since it's my opinion...--Mikoyan21 19:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm gonna be bold and remove the sentence, again, until someone offers a reputable source that states that the cover is considered, quote: one of the ugliest album covers ever. -TheHande 19:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Look, many of the reviews of the album mention ugly cover and if you ever have followed any discussion about DoD, the ugly album cover is bound to come up very quickly. To say that album cover is considered ugly by many is a FACT. Stop being an idiot. --Mikoyan21 18:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

You don't even have an argument. Cite a source or shut up. That is all. -TheHande 19:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I guess I might have had a fanatic attack or something. I rephrased the ending so asto sound less biased (removed the word ugly). If the creator of the piece is unhappy then I think I too have to acknowledge that there is something slightly wrong with the cover. I do still want some citasion on the whole prank thing. -TheHande 12:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• Here are some sources about the opinion on Dod cover from blogcritics, [1] which also links to a 11 page thread universally condemning it on CGtalk, a leading forum for discussion on (3D) design (and totally unbiassed). [2].

(and totally unbiassed)

yeah, righttttt... — Prodigenous Zee - 10:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)