From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
[edit] Fulsome praise
- "From the beginning, Simmons showed himself to be one of the few genre authors who possessed plot developing abilities, and he proved able to write high-level prose that is derived from his familiarity with the classics."
The first part of the sentence strikes me as rather excessively POV, both towards Simmons and against all the other genre authors. The second part seems complimentary but not particularly meaningful; what is the definition of "high-level prose"? I'm not familiar with his work, could someone who is revise the sentence in question? —Clement Cherlin 04:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Better now? --maru (talk) contribs 05:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)