Dangerous Dogs Act 1991

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acts of Parliament of predecessor
states to the United Kingdom
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1601
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1659
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1699
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1706
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of Scotland
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of Ireland
Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom
1707–1719 | 1720–1739 | 1740–1759 | 1760–1779
1780–1800 | 1801–1819 | 1820–1839 | 1840–1859
1860–1879 | 1880–1899 | 1900–1919 | 1920–1939
1940–1959 | 1960–1979 | 1980–1999 | 2000–Present
Acts of the Scottish Parliament
Acts of the Northern Ireland Parliament
Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly
Orders in Council for Northern Ireland
United Kingdom Statutory Instruments

The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is a piece of UK legislation that was introduced in response to various incidents of serious injury or death resulting from attacks by aggressive and uncontrolled dogs, particularly on children. These incidents received heavy tabloid attention, causing widespread public concern over the keeping of dangerous dogs and a resulting legislative response.

Four breeds in particular were identified by the Act:

It was made illegal to own any of these dogs without specific exemption from a court. The dogs have to be muzzled and kept on a lead in public, they must be registered and insured, neutered and receive microchip implants. The Act was also supposed to ban the breeding, sale and exchange of these dogs.

There have been several test cases of the Act, most famously Dempsey (a pit bull terrier) who in 1995 was finally reprieved from a destruction order, to widespread media attention. The definition of the word "type" in the legislation was of particular controversy, as was the lack of discretion that the Act gives magistrates.

Contents

[edit] Criticism of the Act

The Act has been described as a piece of rushed legislation[1] which was an overreaction to a transient public mood[2]. The Act is sometimes cited as an unfavourable example of such legislation[3], and in January 2007 was included in public responses to a BBC Radio 4 poll of unpopular UK legislation [4]

[edit] Comparable legislation outside Great Britain

The Act does not apply outside of Great Britain. Other countries also have laws pertaining to dangerous dogs. These vary in severity. In some jurisdictions in Australia dogs which have been declared dangerous are required to wear a collar of red and yellow stripes; under the legislation of some municipalities of Queensland, such dogs are seized and killed.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links