From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
[edit] LGBT category
While there's no doubting that the homosexuality of a couple of the characters does impact on the plot of Damaged Goods at times, personally I think that including it in the "LGBT literature" category may be stretching things a little. At the end of the day it is just a TV tie-in novel, after all. (Albeit an excellent one!). Opinions? Angmering 20:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- That category also contains Blake's 7 Fan Fiction, so it's not all high-brow stuff ;-) Tim (meep) 21:45, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Ye Gads, we have an article on that? ;-) Angmering 21:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- I would say the category is tendentious. And, unfortunately, the article reads far too much like a fan piece. Charles Matthews 08:51, 12 April 2006 (UTC)