User talk:Dale101usa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Dale101usa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 05:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Chris-Evert+her-lethal-weapon-97-800.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chris-Evert+her-lethal-weapon-97-800.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Mary-Pierce-black-dress+stocks-74H-610.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mary-Pierce-black-dress+stocks-74H-610.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 13:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for edit summary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace.)
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 03:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mimi Rogers
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mimi Rogers, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 14:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
This is a peculiar comment, because Acccording To The Wikipedia Mimi was in the March 1993 issue of "Playboy" in the USA. Do see "People who were in 'Playboy' in the 1990s. Further, Mimi Rogers herself was on "The Tonight Show" this week, and she and Jay Leno openly discussed her nude appearance in Playboy "13 years ago". Now, 2006 minus 13 equals 1993, Lo and Behold. Dale A. Wood, MS in engineering and MA in mathematics.
[edit] Mariah Carey
Please note that Wikipedia:Fair use criteria states free-licensed images must always be used if located, and that they should never be replaced by non-free ones. Also, the description pages for all non-free images must have a valid explanation of why the use of the image on Wikipedia consistutes fair use; see Help:Image page#Fair use rationale and Wikipedia:Fair use. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 00:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Up yours, you ingrate. And I did explain this is a free-use image distributed by ABC-TV. Like it or lump it. Some people need to learn to mind their own business: you do not OWN the Wikipedia or its article on Mariah Caryy,
[edit] Please STOP harming ACURATE AND FACTUAL ARTICLE: SUPERMODEL
PLEASE do not edit what I've confirmed. These girls are supermodels. I am a supermodel expert. I have dozens of magazines. Even go to thefashionspot.com, and EVERYONE THERE ARE HARCORE FANS OF SUEPRMODELS, AND KNOW WHO AND WHO ISN'T A SUPERMODEL. Lil Flip246 22:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
You have removed and re-edited OFFICIAL FACTS, and changed it around. i.e. You put Niki Taylor and Yamilia as coming out in the late 90s, when the truth is they came out in the early 90s! Please do not remove information and re-edit stuff of which you have no knowledge of. Lil Flip246 22:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dale101usa"
-
- You're crazy! As is stated elsewhere in the Wikipedia (Hah!) a Supermodel should be well-known individuals.
Putting little-known characters under the "Supermodel" character is crazy. The Key is to be well-known, not just to be known by some sort of cognostici (SP?) "in-the-know" individuals. By the way, Ms. Diaz-Rahi's first name only has one "i" in it - if you knew anything about Spanish and how things are spelled and pronounced. Furthermore, Yamila Diaz-Rahi was an UNKNOWN until she started appearing in "Sports Illustrated" in the Late 1990's, and the same applies to Nikki Taylor. Just because some 14-15-year-old does some modeling does not make her a Supermodel. This is a job that required some Maturity and Worldwide exposure....
A "supermodel expert"????? You've flushed your brain down the commode! The whole point is that to know who is a supermodel, you don't have to be any expert, just like to know who is the President of the USA or France, or the Queen of England, you do not need to be a Political Scientist... Dale A Wood, a man with Common Sense, who has kept his brains out out the commode!
[edit] List of Astronauts
Thanks for adding details to the List of astronauts by name. However, inserting personal opinions like "So What?" after an entry is not particularly helpful. If you feel the content is not worthy of a Wikipedia article, then be bold and edit or remove it and provide an explanation in the edit summary or on the talk page. Regards Rillian 20:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
==I think that indicating someone as "The first Jewish astronaut" or the "first Black Russian female cosmonaut" is irrelevant and rather dimwitted, and a big "So What". This fades into Deep, Deep Insignificance compared to "He/She was killed on thus and such spaceflight". Please put your brains into perspective about what is important and what is not important!
[edit] Cheryl Tweedy
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Driller thriller 12:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Removing irrelevant NONSENSE is not vandalism - and so, you need to do some serious work on you vocabulary, and probably an overhaul to your brains, too.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Heather-Kozar-portrait-28H-625.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Heather-Kozar-portrait-28H-625.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Julie-London-66-675.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Julie-London-66-675.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Modelling/modeling
The word is spelled "modelling" in English and "modeling" in American English, so both are acceptable for use in Wikipedia, as this is the English Language Wikipedia, not the American English Wikipedia. You should refrain from editing articles purely to force a particular variant, but I'll leave your edit as is for the Estella Warren article, as it is about a US person. Robwingfield (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Day of the Year articles
Regarding this edit: long-standing practice is that if someone has a Wikipedia article, they're automatically entitled to listings under 'Births and 'Deaths' on these pages. Please do not delete valid entries. --CalendarWatcher 13:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Also, please do NOT add editorial comments to entries, such as 'contraversial'. --CalendarWatcher 13:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)