User talk:DakotaKahn/Archive26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] User:JohnnyICON and User:JohnnyIOON

I noticed that one, too. Just a thought, but I'm somewhat inclined to think the guy just made a typo while registering his account. Luna Santin 06:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Thank you for your wishes on my birthday, Dakota! I really appreciate it :) --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 07:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Church of Misery

I began an article on this band, Church of Misery, and this user not only listed it for speedy deletion, but he was quite rude to me after I explained why it doesn't meet WP:CFD. I am thinking about taking this to Wikipedia:Requests for mediation. Please help, and leave your response on my talk page. Thanks for your help. --Eastlaw 07:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] In re: Church of Misery

Thank you, muchos gracias, merci beaucoup, etc. for your assistance. Let me know if you need any help with anything in the future.  :)

I usually work on law-related articles (as I am a 3rd year law student), so I am somewhat less familiar with the difficulties of music-related articles. I recognize that som unscrupulous people use Wikipedia to promote their bands. However, I did not anticipate running into such an issue in this case. Nonetheless, Mr Spunky Toffee's behavior was inappropriate and highly objectionable, so I thank you again for assisting me in this matter. --Eastlaw 07:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:SourceIndustries

Can you please take a look at this user? All of his edits, and even his user page, consist of attacks on a company that he feels is a scam. This may well be true, but given that he provides no evidence, this could be regarded as defamation. Even his user name is probably inappropriate. If you could take a look and offer your opinion, I would appreciate it. Thanks. ---Charles 18:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, no worries. Poor lad was just too high strung. ---Charles 18:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes, definitely :)--Dakota 18:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Y'know, occasionally I worry that there are a number of potentially good editors out there who get off on the wrong foot, and then get scared off when we come down on them for their mistakes. This poor fellow may have been very well-intended, but may never make another contribution. How do we balance the concern for decent editing with the imperative not to "kick the newbies," as it were? ---Charles 17:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your insight and concern. I doubt that he/she would have any useful contributions at the rate he/she was going. Most of the edits this user made have been deleted, The userpage is an attack on a website [1] and the username is a website name so possibly the username could be blocked on that alone. The talk page contains warnings [2]about deleted attack articles (I read the deleted content). Sometimes editors do start off on the wrong foot. I have not gotten an email from the user. Would not say the edits were decent/indecent but they were unencyclopedic yes. If user wishes to change the username and make useful contributions they would be welcome back.--Dakota 02:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I certainly was not offering that as any kind of criticism of your actions, you may rest assured. I was speaking in generalities, really. In this case, I believe you are correct, this editor is unlikely to have ever been a helpful contributor. More than anything, I am concerned about my own actions---specifically, my tendency to be judgmental and to jump to conclusions that are, with hindsight, unfair. Those of us who edit often and with regularity would do well to consider that others are much slower learners. Well, I know that I certainly need to keep that in mind. Thanks for your time and your thoughts. ---Charles 18:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
No problem. I don't see that you were over judgemental in that particular case. That editor appears to have come for a single purpose. As I previously stated I have not heard back from them. I hope they do return with a new username and contribute usefully.--Dakota 18:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peony


     A beautiful peony for you, Dakota. It's wonderful to have you active on Wikipedia again!!
     -- Polaris999 23:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Happy Diwali!

Thank you and a happy Diwali to you too! --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 13:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello Dakota. Thankyou...Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

thanks for your assistance with some of our entries...we thought we had to sign them but are glad you told us not to. 2 questions. how do we link entries to show in google / yahoo searches. 2. where can we find ways to volunteer / help wikipedia? thanks again dakotakahn juliasweet1970--Juliasweet1970 23:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


This is an example of how to add a link

You can link to reference links in the this same manner by inserting the address in between the single brackets and putting the title at the end [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia Wikipedia] would be

You can also get some good editng tips in Help

If you need any more help please feel free to ask.--Dakota 23:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ah ha!!!

thanks again dakota kahn...very helpful! so how come some of our entries come up when searched in google or yahoo...others don't? hmmm..for example...in other words some names when entered in a google or yahoo search box show a link to wikipedia, others don't...do i need to attach a ???? thanks for your continued help ---j :) --128.103.187.59 00:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] last question from me

what's up with that number for my username sometimes? --Juliasweet1970 00:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I am not sure which you are refering to, but if you are not logged in your ip number will show in the history.--Dakota 01:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] sorry

i'm sorry DakotaKahn. The question regarding google and yahoo searches was from me but marked with ip #. Do you know the answer to that question about yahoo/google searches?...also...does DakotaKahn intentionally rhyme with Emotacon? I like your username..thanks, julia --Juliasweet1970 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A star for you

The Original Barnstar that speaks better than any others
I don't believe I've ever met you, but I've noticed some of your work from a distance and thought this might be appropriate. And any friend of Phaedriel probably deserves one anyway. :) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  03:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] For you :)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Hi Dakota
This is for going out of your way to be nice to others. Cheers! --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 13:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey Dakota!

Nice to hear from you. I hope all is well with you and yours. Kukini 15:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Dodo

You are very quick in reverting my addition to Dodo. If you would have read it before you reverted it, you would have seen it is a legitimate and referenced addition. I leave it up to you to correct this unpleasant surprise. 86.84.4.3 19:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

My apologies you are correct.--Dakota 20:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] LIst of artworks

Hi!

One of my fav wiki pages was that of the "List of artworks". It was a good page with links to many notable paintings. Now that it is deleted I find my springboard to a whole new range of paintings/artworks missing. Earlier with the help of the list, I could click away and know/learn about paintings that I never knew about. But deletion of the list makes it impossible to know about other artworks unless I know their names ansd search for them. Could we have the page back or at least moved to something like "List of famous paintings" or something. In any case, a list of famous paintings makes things a lot easier than searching! could we have the page back?

[edit] 50th Anniversary of the Granma

Hi Dakota -- Since 2 December this year will mark cincuenta años since the landing of the Granma in Cuba, I thought it might be good to have it included in the Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 2. During the past 24 hours Zleitzen and I have collaborated to improve the article about the Granma which had been in a rather deplorable state. I hope (but am not at all sure) that we have raised it to the level that would justify its being a link for a "Selected Anniversary". I was wondering if you might take a look at it and, if you feel it merits inclusion, perhaps you could add it to the Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 2 list? (As I understand it, only an admin can made additions to this list.) Or, if you notice parts of it that need more work, please point them out I will hasten to address them ... Many thanks! -- Polaris999 06:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Beatles

Thanks for reverting your revision. I know that you are not supposed to remove AfD tags, but this is clearly vandalism and I have contacted a couple of Admins to sort it out. Thanks for keeping an eye on the article.LessHeard vanU 22:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 70.168.242.15

User:70.168.242.15 is trying to remove warnings from his talk page . . . I think. First he blanked them, then tried to archive them (but he removed any of the latest warnings including a "civil" warning). And with his edit summaries, I'm thinking he needs a temp ban. -WarthogDemon 02:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks and sorry for that. Things seem calm now. Thanks again! -WarthogDemon 02:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] BCHS

why did you have to switch it back to have it without wysocki? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skulipwns (talk • contribs) .

In answer to your query:[3] [4] [5] [6].--Dakota 20:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image on User talk:Generic Character

Hi, just thought I'd pop in and ask you (as the protecting admin) to remove the fair use image from User talk:Generic Character since you have blocked it. Cheers, Localzuk(talk) 23:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I came here to ask the same thing :) Could you remove the Image DakotaKahn? semper fi — Moe 00:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
It has been done by another. Thanks :)--Dakota 00:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Another Star

For a beautifully organized user page with lots of pictures, DakotaKahn is hereby with the Excellent User Page Award. Congrats! Tennis DyNamiTe 21:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For a beautifully organized user page with lots of pictures, DakotaKahn is hereby with the Excellent User Page Award. Congrats! Tennis DyNamiTe 21:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


Please Vote, as per wiktionary the correct spelling is Wiktionary:anti-Semitic NOT Antisemitic. 67.70.68.51 12:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Username block

Hi DakotaKahn, I just saw this in the active blocks log:

  1. 19:22, 14 November 2006, DakotaKahn (Talk) blocked #304426 (expires 19:22, 15 November 2006) (Unblock) (Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ريال مدريد". The reason given for ريال مدريد's block is: "".)
  2. 19:22, 14 November 2006, DakotaKahn (Talk) blocked ريال مدريد (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Unblock) (username non latin characters)

I take it you really only intended the username block, so I lifted the autoblock. BTW, the Arabic name means "Real Madrid" if I'm not mistaken, which doesn't really sound like an account with abusive intent. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Hola, thank you. I blocked the name because it is not in English (non latin characters):)--Dakota 19:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, I can not read arabic. Is that a poem on your page, it looks somwhat familiar strange as it seems for a non speaker.--Dakota 20:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Heheh, it's all Greek to you, right? :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
No I do not understand Greek, only Spanish, Hebrew, English and a tiny bit of Russian. Thanks.--Dakota 20:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

By the way, the same autoblock thing also happened to User:Øø (who isn't even non-Latin, strictly speaking), and apparently a few others you did username blocks for. What combination of blocking flags do you use? I'm quite green as an admin and I'm not sure, but wasn't there some way of blocking an account and letting them nevertheless create new ones? After all, that's basically what we are asking them to do when we say {usernameblock}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

You know you have brought a good question. I just checked and it is that all the boxes (at least on this machine) are automatically checked.
Block anonymous users only
Prevent account creation
Automatically block the last IP address used by this user, and any subsequent addresses they try to edit from


Going to have to check that more closely.--Dakota 20:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] One of These Nights

A topic you might be particularly interested in, as per our previous conversation. —freak(talk) 07:13, Nov. 19, 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my talk page [7] :) See you round. James086 Talk | Contribs 02:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalize

What did I vandalize? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.139.0.12 (talk • contribs). This [8].--Dakota 04:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paraguay

I noticed that you reverted my changes in Paraguay article, that linked to a disambiguation page. May I ask why?

--Dpapic 18:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

This is what I reverted [9] vandalism by an ip user. I don't see that I reverted any changes by you but show me a diff if I did and I will fix it.

--Dakota 18:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

You changes were lost several vandal edits ago. I think I repaired it.--Dakota 18:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't noticed that. It's just that I was discussing the "otheruses" with another user that said that there shouldn't be a link to a disambiguation page, because the other articles weren't as important as Paraguay.

--Dpapic 19:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Yes, it should have one I would think, Paraguay is a country!. Every worthy encyclopedic article no matter how humble is important.--Dakota 19:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wilcox-Mc-Candlish law

As per Deletion Policy, I'd asked for that to be moved to my userspace if it ended in Delete. Can you take care of that for me please, since you carried out the deletion? Thanks. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 03:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. PS: I really don't think it needs to be {{protected}}; there's not anything at WP:PPOL that appears to apply. It should probably just disappear; either I or someone else who cares will remove wikilinks to it in other articles (Godwin's law, Benford's law, etc.) Cheerio! — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
PPS: Can you please also move the deleted Talk:Wilcox-McCandlish_law/archive01 to User_talk:SMcCandlish/Wilcox-McCandlish_law/archive01 ? Seems to be missing... — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 18:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
It is here [10] on the talk page at the bottom, complete.--Dakota 20:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gary Lucas article

Hi Dakota, Good to seee the Zappa quote there - I even got myself some Captain Beefheart cds recently! OK so I am a bad correspondent - havent kept up - but I have been watching the Gary Lucas article - and it really is bascially being fed from a red link that has claimed in the past to be someone with the ok from the artist to put the stuff up (!!) It is very chatoic and unencyclopediac - but I am not completely au fait with his mates and millieau - I suspect someone over your way with good knowledge of the music scene could use a good mop/scissors on the art - and I was wondering if you knew of anyone into the music who might have a go? I may alert another friend who might know more as well - but I thought you might be able to help or know someone into the music so to speak! It really does need a cleanup! Trust you are surviving adminship/life and the rest! Best wishes SatuSuro 14:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)14:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oops!

Oops, sorry, my browser is misbehaving. I was trying to see my sig, but hit something while in preview mode and it saved.--203.109.209.49 05:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa

Hi Dakota,

I have seen that you deleted the article related to Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa. Request you to re-instate the article with necessary changes (if required)--Lijojacob 17:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC) LijoJacob

Hello. That article went through the Afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa ending with a concensus to delete. It was then closed and deleted.--Dakota 17:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

What is the procedure to revert the decision and reinstate the page?--Lijojacob 17:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Lijojacob

[edit] Cherie (actress)

I found it by looking at Special:Whatlinkshere/Cherie (actress). The deletion vote/discussion page is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherie (actress). (And interestingly, at least two of the deletions took place after it.) - Mike Rosoft 16:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

I looked at this [11] when I checked the history and saw the 77 deleted edits. Considering the state the article is in I assumed it was regular repost. Oh well. Cheers.--Dakota 16:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Username

Thank you for letting me know. Would I be justified if I block the account for using too similar username? --BorgQueen 20:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Superman: The Man of Steel (2009 film)

This film article has been created with the same content that was attempted with Untitled Superman Returns sequel. Since the latter article is protected, I thought I'd contact you to give you a heads up about this circumvention that took place. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 22:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

It should be noted that the article does not contain information of a predicting nature. It's completely factual about what is currently known for the sequel to Superman Returns. This is the totle as it's being called by Warner Bros., Bryan SInger, and Brandon Routh. It is not a hindrance on this encyclopedia, merely an avenue to find facts about the film. --CmdrClow 07:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bitterkomix

Der DakotaKahn:


I regret that you deleted the entry on Bitterkomix. I saw that there was a question of notability but I thought it did not apply to the bitterkomix article because it dealt with books. Bitterkomix is a serial comic that deals with sensetive political issues in South Africa like the lingering effects of apartheid, race,and class. Moreover, its founders are artists who are becoming noteworthing in their own right, as evidenced by the sources first to the New York Times and second to an art website, they also have showing in New York. Finally I have no connection to bitterkomics, I just thought it would help show the range of the comic medium.

Best, Hungry Hero —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hungryhero (talk • contribs) 21:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC).

It was an Uncontested prod up for five days.--Dakota 01:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:TitoxD

Um, that actually was me. I was testing a capability of the MediaWiki software to override AntiSpoof. If you check the creation log for the account, you'll see it actually says that I created the account... [12] Titoxd(?!?) 06:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey Titoxd thought I got an imposter, sorry.--Dakota 06:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Beat me to it!

Good to see you out there. Hope you and yours are doing well. Kukini 17:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Understood

OK, I agree. Who are you, are you an administrator? Pooter-the-clown 17:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Isabella V

)

Hello. I was wondering if you could expand on how you came to a delete decision on Isabella V. Thanks in advance. --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Nine to delete-four to keep.--22:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


So it was a vote count? --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, a closure and delete.--Dakota 22:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Isabella V on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Isabella V. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. badlydrawnjeff talk 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Wilcox-McCandlish law

Why is that there? It should just go away. There are no more links of any kind to it in articlespace. :-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 00:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Could you clarify that.--Dakota 01:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Superman: The Man of Steel (film)

I know you have had this page deleted before, I think we recently did it a week ago. It seems the page is being continuously created. Is there a way we can protect this title as well until there is enough information to actually warrant a page? It may seem advisable to protect both variations of the name (film) and (2009 film). Bignole 20:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Both are protected against recreation.--Dakota 01:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. Bignole 03:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, no problem.--Dakota 03:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FreeOTFE

Please read another user's edits before accusing them of vandalism. The changes made to the FreeOTFE page by User_talk:128.138.207.44 are actually valid; it looks like it does actually support mobile devices now. It would also probably be a good idea to remove the last warning added to that user's page? (For once it wasn't vandalism!) ++Martin++ 04:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I will take your word for it and removed only that warning. The others are valid and include image vandalism.--Dakota 04:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)



[edit] Thank you for voting

Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 20:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Your Dec 11th Message to JavaBeanRush

Hi, On Dec 11 you accused me of vandalism but I haven't done any such thing. Would you include specific examples of what you think I vandalised? Otherwise I'll be forced to believe your threat of banishment is based on arbitrary standards and I will have to report you.

Sincerely,

Javabeanrush 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)JavaBeanRush


Updated --

I see that you called my additions to Marge Champion's page vandalism. I've read the Vandalism Standard page you left on my user talk page . My changes are not what is considered vanadlism.

What are you calling vandalism? Would you please take that warning off my user talk page?

This edit [13].--Dakota 05:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Would you please explain how that particular edit is against the stated policies? Javabeanrush 08:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I reverted the edit which left the last warning before it as the final one. When you put in a detail such as that it can easily be mistaken. It might be a good idea to link it next time.--Dakota 14:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. Thanks Javabeanrush 07:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Does this mean I can put the information back onto the page (with citations/links)? Javabeanrush 07:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Well of course.--Dakota 07:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] want a student?

Hi DakotaKahn! I see from the status page that you don't have an admin coaching student right now. Are you still interested in being a coach? If so I'll match you with a student soon. Thanks, Fang Aili talk 22:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

FYI, I'm going to remove you from the coaching volunteers page. Cheers, Fang Aili talk 16:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I've lifted an autoblock of yours

Hi Dakota, You recently blocked C.lettingaAntivandal (talk • contribs), presumably for a username violation. This was created by C.lettinga (talk • contribs) as a vandal fighting account, independent of his content-creating account. C.lettinga is a new, but good faith editor with no record of vandalism. I'm familiar with his editing and believe he simply never considered that such an account name might violate policy. Anyway, I concur with the block of his new account, but I have lifted the autoblock on his IP, to permit him to continue editing with his regular account (see here). I hope this is fine with you. Do let me know otherwise. Thanks. Rockpocket 02:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hanukkah חנוכה

  • Hello Dakota. Wishing you a happy Hanukkah. I've also been made aware that Sephardis such as yourself may be quite fond of these delicacies....so enjoy yourself....well not too much in case .... Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Enjoy.....
Enjoy.....

[edit] Merry Christmas

Darwinek wishes you a Merry Christmas!
Darwinek wishes you a Merry Christmas!
Darwinek wishes you a Happy Hanukkah!
Darwinek wishes you a Happy Hanukkah!

Hi Dakota! I just want to say Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah to you! Have a nice holiday time. - Darwinek 20:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Holidays

Wishing you and yours the happiest of holidays! --Kukini 21:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Seasons Greetings

"'May your sense of humour be revived,
May your loved ones smile and be there for you,
May the turkeys only be eaten and not on wikipedia in any animate form,
May may your faith in life be revived at this time,
May long lost friends turn up out of the blue,
May you enjoy life,
and may all red link aggressives evaporate into server black holes for this season.....

SatuSuro 23:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Get well soon Dakota



Wishing you a speedy and full recovery. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you too. I think your random act of kindness warrants a barnstar :) And (assuming you're still sick) get well soon! James086Talk | Contribs 09:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
A star to put on your christmas tree :) James086Talk | Contribs 09:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Winterval(s)!!!! (12-22-06)

Oh, the weather outside is frightful!... But I hope wherever you you are, that it's warm and delightful! : ) —Randfan!!
Oh, the weather outside is frightful!... But I hope wherever you you are, that it's warm and delightful! : ) —Randfan!!


Dear DakotaKahn/Archive26,


I wish you a very, very merry Winterval!

And since I don't know which you celebrate, I hope you have/had/will have a very happy Holiday!. Hope you and your family have a magnificent day, or series of days! You might wanna install the "SaucyMillionaire" font to see this correctly. Cheers, mate! :) —Randfan!!
God (or your deity/deities) bless you and your family! —¡Randfan!Sign here? 02:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


-Note:I was planning to hand these out on the 22 of Dec. Happy holidays —¡Randfan!Sign here? 23:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] laromlab deletion

hi dakota,

you posted a speedy deletion of my page pn laromlab, and i write to you to invite you to please reinvestigate the page because it is not like the previous entry on Laromlab. The previous page may have very well been considered personal promotion but the "new" laromlab page is anything but personal promotion. It simply states facts about a musical artist that has contributed to a thriving underground music scene, thanks for your consideration in not delteing this page!

-brandon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Laromlab (talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC).

You might consider taking it to Wikipedia:Deletion review it's a db/repost Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laromlab. I am not going to delete it.--Dakota 05:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Howdy Dakota!

Hey...Merry Xmas, DK...just ran across something odd...look at this edit record [14]. I think this user may be related to the one you just blocked that was leaving all the test 4 warnings. What do you think? --Kukini 05:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Thought it was a bit odd. Hope all is very well with you and yours! --Kukini 06:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] mistake?

mistake? West Brom 4ever 18:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Who are you? This is state I left the article [15] in so I don't think so. Anyway I reverted and fixed a couple of vandalism. I don't see any edits to the article from your username. Sorry if i am mistaken.--Dakota 18:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
i was just tracking some articles and users and saw the edit on Amina Haq. i realized already before that you corrected the article and must admit it is very good job, but as i said, i just noticed your mistaken revert. sorry for the inconvenience and keep it up. West Brom 4ever 18:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Happy Holidays

Happy Christma-hanu-kwanzaa

Merry Christmas! (Have you been good this year?)

Happy Hannukah! (Menorot to light up your day)

Happy Kwanzaa! (A stamp for any vacation postcards)

Happy Holidays from Tennis DyNamiTe (sign here)!

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for noticing the note left in my archives and removing it. However, I try to keep all messages unless they uncomprehensible vandalism, so I put it back and added an {{unsigned}} thing. In any case, I am thankful that you were looking out for me. Cheers, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 05:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome. Actually I was reverting a vandal. (after seeing this edit[16]) it seemed that your archive was also vandalized.--Dakota 05:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/a/k/User_talk%7EDakotaKahn_Archive26_0be5.html"