Talk:Dairy Farm International Holdings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
 An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project! | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
|
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the Project's importance scale. | |
|
Hong Kong To-do:
Project Maintenance
|
||
The company's small icon has been deleted. I am wondering should we add them again. I think it is a good idea to contain such kind of small logos which can give a clear mind to the reader which company is talking about.
[edit] Career oppurtunities/shareholder?? neutrality?
I checked this article a while back and got some good information. It wasn't a full or complete article, but what i read was factual and unbiased.
But from what i've seen of other company profiles don't think its quite appropriate to put in career oppurtunities... not exactly as relevant information to Diary Farm, looks just like either advertisement or job recruitment.
and shareholder information? not many other ones on wikipedia have such, have moved it down, but actually would prefer to delete this too as, to me, its like... oo invest here!
Neither seems very neutral..
Also, please sign your comments. Knowsitallnot 04:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Neutral - wordings
I would suggest removal of emmotive words such as reffering to the company as "she". But generally the article is fine. Some of the tenses are incorrect.
But it was both interesting and useful
