Talk:Dagoth Ur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Baldur's Gate series Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

This article is part of WikiProject The Elder Scrolls, focused on organizing TES-related info in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and discuss any suggestions concerning articles on the talk page.

[edit] What's Up with Dagoth Ur?

How come nobody wants to talk about Dagoth Ur? What's the deal? Dagoth Ur is badass.-Leandreamo

He is a badass which is copyrighted by Bethesda Softworks, and their written material has been copied here. Rycanada 00:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Game Info?

Should there be in-game info, strategy, and tips on interacting/preparing/fighting Dagoth Ur?

No, leave that for the strategy guides and TES specific wikis. --Dv82matt 07:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

This looks almost completely copy/pasted from in-game documents.--128.171.230.38 02:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inferring Dagoth Ur's Perspectives

Inferrence is by it's nature speculation and original research. Should this section be removed? VoidTalker 16:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I went ahead and removed it, as none of the information presented in that section is explicitly stated or even implied in the games. The author as much as acknowledged that it was original research when he titled it. See Inference. VoidTalker 18:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)