User talk:Customs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! --Ginkgo100 talk ยท e@ 21:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks!
[edit] Elizabeth II
Can you please not change Elizabeth II's infobox as you have been doing? There has been long discussions and page protection to sort this out, and everyone had finally agreed to accept the current wording. To come and change this without reading the discussion, or even leaving a comment yourself, is extremely arrogant. I would encourage you to leave it how it is and not change things when people have agreed how to word it. --Berks105 11:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please obey the rules or leave
Your creation of Category:Queen Elizabeth II when you know that the proposal to use that name was rejected is the most blatant possible breach of Wikipedia's rules. If you are not prepared to accept that Wikipedia operates by consensus do not participate. Chicheley 15:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- That was closed as no consensus, what policy did I break Mr Chicheley, I followed wikipedias rules. If you bothered to read that last CfD you would see that a lot of people wanted it changed, and Mr Chicheley, because it was closed for as no consensus. I would suggest you keep your cool and attacking users is the blatant possible breach of Wikipedia's rules. Customs 22:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- No consensus means no change, what part of that don't you understand? It does not mean, "anyone can do what they like" from now on. Unless you are a sockpuppet you are a very inexperienced user who has attracted nothing but reprimands for your conduct to date, so you really need to review how you contribute. Hawkestone 22:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry
Thanks for your comments and good luck on Wikipedia. --Berks105 10:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)