Talk:Custom House station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trains
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on London's transport system. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or visit the Portal.

Contents

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 22:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


Custom House stationCustom House DLR station — Served only by the Docklands Light Railway, at least until Crossrail has opened Simply south 16:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

[edit] Survey - Support votes

  1. Support - makes sense to me. ArtVandelay13 17:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support - wikipedia should reflect reality and adopt the naming convention used for other DLR stations; historical context can be mentioned simply by introducing, The station opened in 1855, as Custom House Station ... with a redirect from the Custom House station. Kbthompson 11:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey - Oppose votes

  1. Oppose - the article also covers now closed stations on other lines. I see no need to move unless you plan separate articles for each with one central article - I don't see that as necessary. -- Beardo 17:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Oppose - for same reasons as Beardo - Operational status changes should not affect WP naming, and if they do we have got our naming standards wrong. -- Chris j wood 17:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. Oppose - past and possible future lines justify simple station name --Henrygb 01:37, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:
  • Surely this should just be closed now as no concensus ? -- Beardo 06:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.