Cultural determinism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cultural determinism is the belief that the culture in which we are raised in determines who we are at emotional and behavioral levels. This supports the theory that environmental influences dominate who we are instead of biologically inherited traits.

It is also used to describe the concept that culture determines economic and political arrangements. It is an idea which has recurred in many cultures over human history, from ancient civilisations through the present.

1 Cultural determinism and social/gender roles
- 1.1 Studies of cultural determinism on sex roles
2 Cultural determinism as a political and economic influence
- 2.1 Examples in history
3 See also
4 External links

[edit] Cultural determinism and social/gender roles

There have been many studies done to see whether or not culture has the greatest impact on the development of an individual. This includes society/gender roles, as well as personality traits.

[edit] Studies of cultural determinism on sex roles

In Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies (1935), Margaret Mead compared the sex roles of three New Guinea Societies, and claimed that all three were arranged very differently from our own.

In the Arapesh culture both men and women were supposed to be mild-mannered and lacking in libido (rather like European women);

In the Mundugumor both genders seemed aggressive and high sexed ('masculine');

The Tchambuli supposedly showed a reversal of European sex roles, with the women being dominant and the men emotionally dependent.

[edit] Cultural determinism as a political and economic influence

There are a number of theories of social development that describe culture as the factor that determines all of the others. This is distinct from theories of economic determinism such as that of Marx, namely that an individual or class' role in the means of production determines outlook and cultural roles (although some Marxists reject the label "economic determinism" as an accurate description of Marx's views). Political movements rooted in cultural determinism usually stand opposed to political and economic ideologies or consider them of lesser importance than factors such as religion, race, and nationality. However, cultural determinists do not necessarily disagree with Marx's view of social class as an important determining factor as well. The idea of cultural determinism is extremely common: numerous societies have believed that their habits, ideas and customs were what determined the shape of their political and economic arrangements, and were the source of their uniqueness above all else. This can be seen in adherence to national epics, particular religious customs, and focus on the importance of language as the determiner of national identity.

[edit] Examples in history

While Niccolò Machiavelli argued that political behavior was universal, he also pointed out that elements of culture, particularly religion, could produce particular political arrangements which were advantageous to those that had them.

Sociologist Max Weber wrote about the relationship between Protestantism and capitalism, arguing that the cultural aspects of religion, including the Protestant work ethic, were crucial in the emergence of economic arrangements.

Romanticism had a large element of cultural determinism, drawn from writers such as Goethe, Fichte, and Schlegel. In the context of Romanticism, the geography molded individuals, and over time customs and culture related to that geography arose, and these, being in harmony with the place of the society, were better than arbitrarily imposed laws.

In media theory many writers take the position that political arrangements are determined by the mass media images that people see, and that these, by displacing other forms of culture, determine the economic and political arrangements.

In modern conservatism, individuals such as commentator Patrick Buchanan and economist Robert Barro argue that cultural norms determine the behavior of political arrangements. However, the cultural determinism of Buchanan and like-minded conservatives is currently a source of conflict among American conservatives.