User talk:Cuddlyable3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Carburetor2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Carburetor2.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Amfm2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Amfm2.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Kochsim.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Kochsim.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:FuelInjector2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:FuelInjector2.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of Image:Carburetor2.png

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carburetor2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. It has been nominated for deletion because it has been obseleted by a more recent version of the diagram. Thank you. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 10:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User Page Comments.

Please refrain from leaving comments (offensive or otherwise) on my userpage. If you have any queries or questions that you would like me to address this is best done on my talk page here. I would also be greatful it if you would stop placing '[sic]' tags throughout my talk page or userpage comments. It is important that mainspace articles are spelt correctly for wikipedia to be seen by the public as reliable, however talk pages and user pages are usually left as the writter[sic] spelt them. I apologise for my sometimes poor spelling, grammar and punctuation but it is the result of dyslexia. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 13:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

All user pages are equipped with Edit buttons. When you WikipedianProlific make any declaration in Wikipedia that deserves comment, not least one where you disparage other workers, you have no reason to be surprised at receiving anyone's comment in the same place. In your case you both erase the evidence of an unworthy "discussion" and yet feel free to continue accusing me elsewhere in Wikipedia of an alleged malicious campagn against your work. I am not willing to accept your excuse that you are dyslexic since you are unquestionably capable of learning to spell words like WRITER correctly.Cuddlyable3 14:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I erased no 'evidence' from my user page. I removed what you wrote as I don't want malicious comments sat on my userpage, but then if anyone wants to see it they can quite easily go back to it via the page history here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WikipedianProlific&oldid=115364675. Now your aruging[sic] about dyslexia to[sic], I'm not offering you another topic to argue with me about, I'm telling you I'm dyslexic and thus my spelling can be off, thats[sic] really all there is to it. Where does this end? The bottom line of it is, if you continue with this agressive and personal attitude then I'll have to seek administrative support. Thats[sic] not a threat it's just that I have better things to do here than argue over trivial things. I'm very happy to have an adult discussion with you about aspects of wikipedia but if you make it personal then theres really nothing to discuss. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 15:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
You erased BOTH your so-called "Notice" and the comments that it engendered. I am surprised that you want to revisit that dialogue but I am unconcerned about it being offered as alleged support for your complaint. There seems nothing wrong with your speed of reading, and if you want to convince anyone that you should get special treatment here because of your alleged dyslexia, I think you need to provide more evidence than a few avoidable misspellings.Cuddlyable3 16:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Well I'm bewildered as to what more evidence one can give. I update my user page, hardly erasing evidence. One thing you'll learn about wikipedia as you spend more time on it is that nothing can be hidden or erased.WikipedianProlific(Talk) 16:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
If you are still talking about evidence for your claimed dyslexia, for that disability to have any meaning it must be diagnosed by a qualified person. Lacking that, I regard your claim as uninteresting as if...let's see, as if you had pretended having Tourette syndrome as excuse for an obscene comment about Wikipedia (on the record).Cuddlyable3 20:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:WikipedianProlific, you will be blocked. --Samtheboy (t/c) 12:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/u/d/User_talk%7ECuddlyable3_ee51.html"