Talk:Crypto-Calvinism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Crypto-Calvinism is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Crypto-Calvinism falls within the scope of WikiProject Calvinism, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Calvinism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines.
|
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
[edit] Bias
I've reverted the article to where it was before a paid employee of a religious group that has always attacked and opposed (Crypto-)Calvinism, User:Ptmccain, has changed this article to his own POV. This is really dragging theological fights from the 16th and 17th century to the present. It's as if the Consul General of Turkey would openly "correct" the essay on the Armeniam massacres! Some of the most significant facts, such as the execution of Krell, and also the legacy today are simply deleted, the entire essay is made to sound as if this was the problem of some Wittenberg professors who has the "wrong views", and so on. It's really amazing that this is done openly, but well, with activist fundamentalists (who go back to "Gnesio-Lutherans" that have nothing to do with Martin Luther himself, who because of people like that said that he was "not a Lutheran"), nothing should surprise one.
