Talk:Crusaders of Might and Magic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Baldur's Gate series Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

That was annoying. Had to redo the Diablo disambig bit 12 times because wikipedia was playing up. Oh well. Just felt like saying that somewhere. 203.122.218.47 17:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

Sikon's tagged this as lacking neutrality; is this because it takes a qualitative stance on the subject matter? ERobson 22:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, it's full of statements such as "It was part of a deliberate effort by 3DO to cash in on successful franchises with hastily-developed spin-offs." and "The voice acting is terrible, even by the low standards of video game voice acting." These sentences are in no way factual or encyclopedic, let alone neutral. - Sikon 07:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

I tried to work on it a bit. What do you think about this new version? — Shir Khan (?-"-!) — 23:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

It needs citations for those claims about being a flop and widely regarded as sub-par. MacMoney 10:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I attempted to copy edit the entire article, and hopefully got rid of a bit of the bias. I haven't yet put citations in for the "flop" etc. Maybe I can find something to support it. I also edited the system requirements and put the actual technical ones in. Elsbeth0 00:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)