Cross-claim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Civil Procedure
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Doctrines of civil procedure Jurisdiction Subject matter jurisdiction Diversity jurisdiction Personal jurisdiction Removal jurisdiction Venue Change of venue Forum non conveniens Pleadings and motions Service of process Process serving laws Complaint Cause of action Class action Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 Demurrer Answer Affirmative defense Reply Counterclaim Cross-claim Joinder Impleader Interpleader Pre-trial procedure Discovery Interrogatories Depositions Resolution Without Trial Default judgment Summary judgment Voluntary dismissal Involuntary dismissal Settlement Trial Parties Plaintiff Defendant Jury Voir dire Burden of proof Judgment Judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) Renewed JMOL (JNOV) Motion to set aside judgment New trial Remedy Injunction Damages Attorneys' fees American rule English rule Declaratory judgment Appeal Mandamus Certiorari
view /edit this template

A cross-claim is a claim brought against a co-party in the same side of a lawsuit. That is, a plaintiff brings a claim against another plaintiff, or a defendant brings a claim against another defendant.

[edit] U.S. Federal courts

In the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this is codified in Rule 13(g). In the federal rules, a cross-claim is proper if it relates to a matter of the original jurisdiction. Proper jurisdiction is determined by a finding of whether the suit that is being initiated arises from the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the suit.

The policy for allowing cross-claims is that they promote efficiency and consistency. Furthermore, the same underlying facts will be litigated on the main claim as well as on the cross-claim preserving efficiency in the judicial system by resolving multiple claims that might arise between the parties as opposed to courts trying each claim invidivually and re-litigating the same facts. Furthermore, this will prevent inconsistent verdicts that might harm the public perception of the judicial process. Finally, because cross-claims are not mandatory, they allow the moving party the opportunity to sue later. The plaintiff is the master of his complaint, and this is holds true in cross-claims.