User talk:Cremepuff222/Archive3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents 1 Question 2 Yes, you may have one 3 You have mistakenly identified my edit as vandalism 4 RE:Signature 5 Hello 6 A Barnstar (well technically, it's an award) 7 Hi 8 That userpage 9 Warning Templates 10 MONOBOOK? 11 Smile! 12 RE:Signature 13 Hello 14 A Barnstar (well technically, it's an award) 15 Thank you! 16 Hi 17 That userpage 18 Warning Templates 19 MONOBOOK? 20 Hi to you, too 21 Re: Question on MOTD 22 Thanks 23 Your editor review 24 HEY 25 Completely random subject 26 Adoption 27 Congratulations!!! 28 Jbill007 29 WP:AIV 30 Rockvee 31 Re:Adoption 32 Mergers 33 Hello 34 Look 35 RE:New Menus 36 :) 37 Check 38 Graduation 39 Proposed new sig 40 Thanks Anyway 41 Hi! 42 RE:Confused in confusionland 43 Userbox 44 RE:...! 45 Also fooled 46 Xiner's IP 47 Redian:Assignments and Questions

Question

Thank you for comming to my help request. I have been trying revert a few pages that have either been partialy vandelised or where new informaation has been added but there is no sorce to back up the claim. I have tried to revert, but with no luck. Everytime i check it in prewiew it has not worked the way it should have done, so i just leave it. I can't quite work out what i do worng despite checking my actions. Any idea as to what i might be doing wrong? Thank you for your time. Hon.DJP 21:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you may have one

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For reverting vandalism, copyediting, and your work at WP:MOTD. I'm sure you've done a lot more, but I thought giving you a combo barnstar would be best. Peace, ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 01:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

You have mistakenly identified my edit as vandalism

In the article on Phenomenon, I rearranged the sections in a more logical way, so that the general use of the term comes before the...well, not general. However you (or more likely your script, since it happened so quickly) reverted the edit, and accused me of vandalism:

Reverted 1 edit by Am088 identified as vandalism to last revision by Peterdjones. using TW

According to Wikipedia:Vandalism,

Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.

Since my edit was not an "attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia," I assume that it was a mistake, and I'd like you to take any steps to prevent that from happening.

I would also like to advise you to make a few changes to the message you leave:

• Use the standard ==Heading== rather than ===Subheading=== when replying -- you are not replying to the last message on my talk page and it messes up my table of contents.
• Leave have a link to where I should report false edits or malfunctions such as this one, especially if you are using beta scripts such as Twinkle.
• Remove the welcome message. I already have been welcomed three years ago.

Thanks

---AM088 (talk) 01:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

RE:Signature

You sig looks nice? How did you do the fade? °o°Smartie960°o°Smartie-Pants-So Smart 22:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello

'Ello. --Theunicyclegirl 23:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

A Barnstar (well technically, it's an award)

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		I, Steptrip, hereby award you the exceptional newcomer award for having made more edits in one month than I have made in six, albeit most of them were userspace edits, you deserve it nonetheless.  ~Steptrip 01:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

You really have made more edits than I (see here and here for proof), it seems like I can distinctly remember you having more userspace edits; didn't you ask Xiner to delete and restore your page, or something?  ~Steptrip 01:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hello! Chiefsfan364 (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

That userpage

See User_talk:Everett_James_Lines. Xiner (talk, email) 20:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. That's very kind. Xiner (talk, email) 21:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning Templates

Only use the {{subst:uw-vandalism3|NameOfPageVandalized}}, or any equivalent template after another warning has been posted. Instead of using the aforementioned template you can use the {{subst:uw-vandalism4im|NameOfPageVandalized}} if the vandalism is serious enough on the first vandalization. Please, don't take this personally, I had a problem with not knowing which warning template to use until an admin came along and told me. Thanks,  ~Steptrip 23:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Try using "*WARNING: Editcountitis can be fatal, if symptoms continue, please consult an admin." This is entirely up to you, though.

P.S. I'm working on a new barnstar, the Imperium barnstar; any help with coding will be appreciated.  ~Steptrip 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

		The Imperium Barnstar
		This motto is not an actual reward (sorry), but rather it is to see how much you like the design of it  ~Steptrip 00:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

How do you like it.  ~Steptrip 00:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry that I was so hasty, I just copied the coding for The Original Barnstar and modified it. You can find the template right about here.  ~Steptrip 00:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Your's included only your signature, so I looked at the edit window of {{smile}}, and I found coding that fixed everything, try it out in User:Steptrip/Sandbox. P.S. What did you make on your literature test that you were telling me about approx. 1 week ago?  ~Steptrip 01:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

MONOBOOK?

What was that thing you told me about monobooks and javascript? It sounds intriguing... :) Oh, and I couldn't run tonight. Sorry :( Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Good point. Maybe he'll have posted the message before 7:55 AM EST Tomorrow. Anyway, I have to retire to bed right now /*Yawn*/  ~Steptrip 01:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Smile!

Saber girl08 04:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

RE:Signature

You sig looks nice? How did you do the fade? °o°Smartie960°o°Smartie-Pants-So Smart 22:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello

'Ello. --Theunicyclegirl 23:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

A Barnstar (well technically, it's an award)

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		I, Steptrip, hereby award you the exceptional newcomer award for having made more edits in one month than I have made in six, albeit most of them were userspace edits, you deserve it nonetheless.  ~Steptrip 01:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

You really have made more edits than I (see here and here for proof), it seems like I can distinctly remember you having more userspace edits; didn't you ask Xiner to delete and restore your page, or something?  ~Steptrip 01:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you very much for the barnstar! It's great to have that encouragement to keep going. Thanks again. --Tewy 02:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I know how you feel. I just spent who knows how long moving about forty mottoes from Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Approved (which I see has filled back up again) to the schedule page. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 02:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it's very time consuming with the sheer number of mottos. --Tewy 02:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hello! Chiefsfan364 (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

That userpage

See User_talk:Everett_James_Lines. Xiner (talk, email) 20:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. That's very kind. Xiner (talk, email) 21:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning Templates

Only use the {{subst:uw-vandalism3|NameOfPageVandalized}}, or any equivalent template after another warning has been posted. Instead of using the aforementioned template you can use the {{subst:uw-vandalism4im|NameOfPageVandalized}} if the vandalism is serious enough on the first vandalization. Please, don't take this personally, I had a problem with not knowing which warning template to use until an admin came along and told me. Thanks,  ~Steptrip 23:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Try using "*WARNING: Editcountitis can be fatal, if symptoms continue, please consult an admin." This is entirely up to you, though.

P.S. I'm working on a new barnstar, the Imperium barnstar; any help with coding will be appreciated.  ~Steptrip 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

		The Imperium Barnstar
		This motto is not an actual reward (sorry), but rather it is to see how much you like the design of it  ~Steptrip 00:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

How do you like it.  ~Steptrip 00:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry that I was so hasty, I just copied the coding for The Original Barnstar and modified it. You can find the template right about here.  ~Steptrip 00:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Your's included only your signature, so I looked at the edit window of {{smile}}, and I found coding that fixed everything, try it out in User:Steptrip/Sandbox. P.S. What did you make on your literature test that you were telling me about approx. 1 week ago?  ~Steptrip 01:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

MONOBOOK?

What was that thing you told me about monobooks and javascript? It sounds intriguing... :) Oh, and I couldn't run tonight. Sorry :( Chiefsfan364 (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Good point. Maybe he'll have posted the message before 7:55 AM EST Tomorrow. Anyway, I have to retire to bed right now /*Yawn*/  ~Steptrip 01:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi to you, too

'Ello. Not much -- I just got two awesome records for $2.50. I made three userboxes to celebrate. :D

The records are awesome ... one by The Who and one by The Police. Muahahaa. --Theunicyclegirl 21:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I know, there's an awesome music store around here that sells used records for like nothing. Mine were in the $1 bin and the $3 bin, but were 40% off because they were used. Plus tax. They're both sort of classic rock. The Police have some reggae influences though. --Theunicyclegirl 21:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Technically they're punk rock, but they were punk rock of their time. Now they sound more like classic rock compared to today's punk. I still love them, though. -- Theunicyclegirl 21:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it is. But not all their stuff is that cheap. New CDs are $16.50. Still, the records are nice and cheap because not many people buy them. Except for me. I wish current artists would release their music on vinyl... --Theunicyclegirl 21:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ha. Nice. To go new page patrolling, click here. Try to find things that sound like they might meet deletion criteria. To make it easier, go to User:Lupin/anti-vandal_tool (I think that's the right link...) and add it to your monobook. --Theunicyclegirl 21:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I usually go every time I'm online, however not always. Why do you ask? -- Theunicyclegirl 21:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I was denied AutoWiki AntiVandal? I think you may mean VandalProof. And yes, that may be why. However, I need to get my edit count up anyway for many things. I've been working on it ;) -- Theunicyclegirl 21:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

AntiVandal is just a script. It's free for anyone to use. I think you mean VandalProof (see above.) -- Theunicyclegirl 21:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hehe. Third time's the charm! --Theunicyclegirl 21:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Question on MOTD

Can anyone close a nomination, even if he or she voted on the motto? I moved three nominations into the awaiting list, and I'd like to close a couple, just to get a feel of how to do it. Thanks in advance. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh I see now, users involved in the discussion can't close it. Could you still show me how? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your willingness to help. To answer your first question, I'll start by saying that it's more of a guideline that users involved in the discussion not also close it. The phrasing in the procedure is to prevent someone from going against consensus to close a nomination (e.g. if only one person supported the motto, we wouldn't want them to close it). By having a third person close nominations, the closing is much more likely to be neutral. However, as in my recent mass closing, I felt it necessary to clear out the increasingly larger nominations page, which included many that I had voted for. The closing was purely out of need, and I tried to go with consensus on each nomination, even if it was against my vote. If I was in doubt, or might have caused some controversy, I reopened it. So, if you're just getting a feel for the process, it's probably best that you pick ones you're not involved with.

Here is an example from Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates of a nomination closed by the nominator. You can see their reason at the bottom of the page states that it was a clear consensus of support. That's about how motto nominations should be closed.

To close a nomination, you basically follow the closing procedure on the nominations page. Here I have summarized:

1. Pick from "Awaiting decision".
2. Determine consensus, if any.
3. See this discussion for when to approve, reject, or reopen.

   From my experience:

   Nominations may only be approved if consensus favors support of the motto.

   Nominations may be reopened only once and only if: they have not received enough votes to gain supporting consensus, but promise to if given a second chance.

   All other nominations should be rejected, including those that have not reached consensus.

   Try to keep the closing as uncontroversial as possible. If in doubt, reopen (or don't close it at all!).

4. Either approve, reject, or reopen.
5. If approved or rejected, archive entire nomination.
6. If approved, add approved page.
7. If rejected, only archive.
8. If reopened, copy full discussion (including edits? it's probably best to keep them together) to "In review".

Hopefully that helps. --Tewy 00:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I already have another question... :). The last motto on the awaiting list has three support votes (one from me). Is this enough to go ahead and say that it can be used? Or should it be re-opened? --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 01:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I assume you meant: Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations#If this is your limit, you can't exceed it; If you exceed it, it's not your limit. ...And it looks like Steptrip has already reopened it. Sorry for not responding in time. In any case, I suppose it would have had enough support to approve it, considering how many votes most nominations get, but reopening it was safe, especially considering the comment made by Steptrip about not getting it. I'm quickly developing a policy of "if in doubt, reopen", and this goes along those lines. --Tewy 01:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism from my userpage. Cynrin 01:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Your editor review

Not a problem at all reviewing you and you do great work. My concern with your edits toWikipedia:Motto of the day is that the motto's are displayed on userpages, its not really helping the encyclopedia, in an Rfa, high(ish) number of edits to this project could lead to opposes - i.e. wastes too much time on userspace than mainspace. I know its not your major work, but it is something worth considering for the future, anymore questions, let me know! Cheers Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 01:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

HEY

Can you do this for me to see if it works on your computer? OK, follow these steps:

1. Go to my user page.
2. Click the link Articles!
3. Does it work?

--Yummie 19:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I will not spam. --Yummie 19:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, no, I don't feel that bad. It is ok. --Yummie 20:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean, 'reorder your talk page'? --Yummie 21:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Completely random subject

On a completely random note, what is your IQ?  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 00:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

There are some that you can take on the internet, but none give you the level of accuracy that a proctored test does (or at least that's what I've heard ...). Nonetheless, they give you a basic idea of what it is.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 00:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I took the one to which the hyperlink leads, and I took about three variations of that test, averaged the scores together, and found that I scored a 133.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 00:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I accept your challenge.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 00:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

You can create an email account through Yahoo or MSN Mail.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 00:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Like I said at the beginning, it's a very informal thing, so you can get out anytime. No hard feelings, and I'll still answer any questions you have, anytime. Xiner (talk, email) 01:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Sigh. I'm not happy about it (nor should I), but I've been busy recently and yeah, I think it's for the best. Feel ABSOLUTELY free to ask me anything anytime though. Please. I'll be offend if you don't. :) Xiner (talk, email) 01:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely.

Xiner (talk, email) 01:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Argh, I was trying to be sneaky about the fish business. See you around. Xiner (talk, email) 01:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!!!

You've reached the 3000 edit count milestone and passed the 500 mainspace count milestone. Because of the latter, you can now list for approval for the AutoWikiBrowser. (I have it and it is awesome!!)  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I always play it relatively safe, for some reason. When I applied for VPRF, I waited until I had 260 mainspace edits. For AWB, I waited until I had 510 mainspace edits.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I just didn't want to be denied the programs.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I could have, but for arbitrary reasons, I wanted the program the first time that I applied.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

There was nothing stating that in WP:TALK, so I assume that it is just a user's preference on how he / she indents his / her posts.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Jbill007

Yes I would like to be adopted! {jbillups 19:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)}

Cremepuff, adoptees should not be current adopters (per WP:ADOPT).  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

You are still adopted by Theunicyclegirl, however.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

On that note, I apologize for my impulsiveness. Feel free to adopt any users!! BTW, you may want to post your newly found adopter status here.  ~Steptrip _{You raise me up} 19:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV

We usually don't tell people they've been reported to WP:AIV. It goes like this:

1. Warn user as long as necessary (depends on severity and frequency of vandalism)
2. Report to WP:AIV
3. If they get blocked, then the admin will place a warning themselves. If they don't get blocked, then we just don't do anything- typically users aren't blocked because they have stopped vandalizing or have not been warned sufficiently. --Wafulz 19:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Rockvee

Hello. I would like to be adopted. Please raise me! :P Rockvee 22:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

um...ok. I will do my assignment...Rockvee 22:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Most of my edits are reverting vandalisms and I do some RC patrol. So i guess I want learn vandal fighting skill.Rockvee 22:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Adoption

I would like to be adopted by you. Hmrox 22:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I like reading and swimming. I'm also intested in traveling the world when I get older. Hmrox 22:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I would like to learn how particpate in debates over an issue in an article on it's talk page and become a better user. Hmrox 22:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

What would be a good way to help out other users? Hmrox 22:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Mergers

An upmerge is just a kind of merge where members of a category are placed into a parent cat, then the subcat is deleted. It's like "merge into xxx" but only for a subcat. Xiner (talk, email) 02:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Hello --Jazzy Trumpeteer 16:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Look

Check out this link! I am fighting for tomato's rights! (and other pizza ingredients!) Chiefsfan364 (talk) 22:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

RE:New Menus

It looks nice ... did you create the image's hyperlink by superimposing the link over the image? I'm asking this because I saw no {{click}} and no Imagemap delimiters (<imagemap> </imagemap>).  ~Steptrip 01:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

 :)

Please sign my sig book! Thanks; DTD

Check

I made that article! HereChiefsfan364 (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Graduation

I don't know. You shouldn't graduate merely because you don't want to hurt Xiner's feelings. Do you think I've taught you all I can? If so, then I think it's appropriate that you graduate. And I will review you, don't worry. I could have sworn I already did... Hmm. :D --Theunicyclegirl 18:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good to me! Adios! -- Theunicyclegirl 21:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

*plays Ode to Joy* Congratulations! You have graduated! -- Theunicyclegirl 21:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I'd have given you a matching robe if I could find one in the Commons. Question: May I steal your "New Duty" thing? 'Twould be veddy cool, and maybe I'd get more reviews that way ;P -- Theunicyclegirl 22:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Heh. Heh. I must admit one of the things I don't know about Wikipedia is how to do signatures. Care to teach your teacher? :D -- Theunicyclegirl 22:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

LOL, we all have our premature Alzheimer's moments. Like the siggy? It looks like a watermelon! ;P --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 22:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Mmmm. Watermelon sure is nummy. My only worry with the sig is that it's too long. I used the code you pasted on my talk page and changed it, but I hear you've gotten some crap about your length, too. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 22:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Proposed new sig

I know that I really shouldn't be worrying about this, but which sig do you like better?

1.  ~ Steptrip
2.  ~Steptrip

Thanks,  ~Steptrip 22:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, the first was the first sig that I was pleased with, but admittidely, I like the second one better as well.  ~Steptrip 22:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Anyway

Thanks for the response, but someone updated my UBXs. They were a little screwy. Thanks for the offer though! :) Chrishy Man 00:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh wait, it was you xDChrishy Man 00:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, sorry for the bother again, but how do you make another page? Like you have a separate one for your userboxes (which I might need).Chrishy Man 00:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again. Hah, well since you offered... how do you do your signature at the end of your Talk page comments? I see different signatures on all the talk pages, and the "~~~~" doesn't seem to be what they're doing. I know how to code the whole link version, but is there a way you have a short little code (that has a name...I forget lol) at the end of your comment? I know it's like a link to the actual drawn out code, on a separate page.

Sorry I sound kinda stupid, but I have had a Wikipedia account for 6 months, and I'm just getting into it xD. Chrishy Man 00:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Lol, thanks again. :) Should I code in Wiki Markup, or HTML? Chrishy Man 00:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again again. And looking at your favorite WikiProject, I'm into MOTD. Thanks for that (even put a motto up, although it isn't all that great) Chrishyman 01:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi!

My brother, Adams921, also says hi. When you click on his link, you will see his userpage. Familiar, huh? My best regards, Chiefsfan364 (talk) 23:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC) do you like my sig? Oh, he has already made his first article... How sweet... I think I might cry... Sniff... Righta This Way...

RE:Confused in confusionland

Just to clarify on the two comments that confused you on my talk page, both of them were added by Adams921 (verified in part by HagermanBot and my checking of the diffs), who was impersonating Fan but I didn't want to scare Adams that impersonation could lead to a block, so I didn't tell him that.  ~Steptrip 03:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Userbox

Sure! I never pretended to be any expert on userbox container-thingies. :D --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 19:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll do it later, but I'm working on getting my edits/experience up. What do you think: Ce De Candy, Inc.. Hee! I created zee article. Muahaha. :D --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 20:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, spar. Are you into geology? It sounds ... boring to me. :D --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 22:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

LOL. Have you ever seen Bubble Boy? "Bright! and shiny/Bright! and shiny..." Hee...

*gasps* Why??? Wait. That's an idiotic question. NOOO! Now who am I going to go to when I have a question??? :'( --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey... that reminds me. I need to do my user page for April Fools'. Muahaha. *sets to work* --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

*gasps again* I hate him, hate him hate him. xD I totally freaked for a second there. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey... that reminds me. I need to do my user page for April Fools'. Muahaha. *sets to work* --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:...!

OH MY GOD!! If any of Xiner's sysop duties have been stressing him or her out, Xiner should leave a request for de-sysoppment on meta, for the good of the community.  ~Steptrip 00:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Also fooled

Why does it scare you? They won't actually do it. Think about it. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Ehm, what link? --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Mhmm. And it didn't work. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Phblblblblt. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 00:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Check it out! --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 02:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Check it out! Hope you like it! I'm going to bed. G'night! --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 02:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Eh, nevermind. I'm back until I collapse of sheer exhaustion. ;) Ah, Wikidiction at its finest. –Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 03:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Xiner's IP

If Xiner lives then the IP geolocation test has confirmed that his IP is: 151.202.74.135. Please tell me if it is wrong, and if it is, please tell me what it is.  ~Steptrip 02:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I just saw a comment on Xiner's talk saying that you "should go back to your dolphins" from that IP, so I just want to make sure it wasn't one of his pranks.  ~Steptrip 02:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

On a completely different note, please view this important video announcement from Jimbo Wales.  ~Steptrip 02:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

"Tell the Wikitruth d**n it!" -Jimbo Wales
This is my new favorite quote.  ~Steptrip 03:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Redian:Assignments and Questions

Hey, rather than some long drawn out message, I'll keep it to: I'm looking for a mentor to show me the ropes, would you please adopt me? Redian 01:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Of course I still want to be adopted. Expect the 1st assignment done by Sunday, probably before then. Redian 01:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, so here it is:

Interests:

• Helping people
• Music (Listening, Playing Violin, Viola, Cello, Piano, Saxophone (again) soon.)
• Programming - I know a slightly odd form of Basic, VB on a Basic Level, Perl on an intermediate level.
• Computers
• Academics

Goals:

• Become a respectable member of the wikipedia community by
  • Improving Articles
  • Creating New Articles
  • Helping others out (some day)

Redian(Talk, My UserPage) 22:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Question: Can Table be made with HTML? Is there something I have to do to use HTML on wikipedia? Or Must I use the wikimarkup?Redian(Talk, My UserPage) 22:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I think I did you one better for the second assignment, three reverts of unnecessary edits:

1. Bengal Tiger
2. Zoo
3. Smoking (dismabiguation)

User:Redian:Redian(Talk) 02:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey, what is my tool box and where is it found? While I'm at it, next time I ask you a question, should I change the topic of this particular discussion on your talk page to something more suitable to what it contains?Redian(Talk) 23:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I hope the heading change isn't to intrusive, but I figure it describes and will describe the bulk of my posts to you. On another note, I'm very very happy with all the info you're giving me I'm finding it quite useful. I'm eagerly awaiting the next assignment, also, do you still want me to give you a diff for the sandbox, or was what I dropped you already fine? Redian (Talk) 04:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)