Talk:Creatures in the Metroid series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Wikitendo logo This article is part of WikiProject Nintendo, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Nintendo related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Plans for this page.

My intention of creating this page was to make a centralized "Master list" of the numerous creatures that appear in the Metroid series games. In my opinion, creatures like Geruta didn't really deserve their own pages, and a link that should be pointing to the Super Metroid creature called a 'Dragon' shouldn't merely run back into the dragon article. Instead, I'm working on this project to make such a page, and then to redirect all pages for specific creatures, such as Covern, to this 'master' page. Any help on this project (including inserting more info, merging more pages, etc.) would be happily appreciated. (Sorry if this sounds awkward, but I'm writing this at 4 AM local time.) ~GMH 08:10, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Should the major revamp box be up? The history says that this page wasn't changed for a whole week. 128.6.175.53 21:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The 6 bounty hunters from MP:H

Didn't Kanden, Trace, Noxus, Spire, Sylux, and Weavel get killed by Gorea? He sucked out their energy and copied their weapons, but they fell down dead. I wrote that down in the article, but someone changed it saying that they escaped the place before it blew up. KdogDS 21:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

There were 6 streaks coming out of the Oubilliete before it blew up in the ending movie. That means that the hunters must have escaped somehow.--Zxcvbnm 22:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

I would argue they survived, the six "ships" coming from Oubilliete seem to support this.

I think they died. When Gorea copied their powers, they stopped moving and dropped to the ground. They seemed pretty dead to me. These 6 "ships" were probably just pieces of the Oublilliete breaking off because of the explosion. KdogDS 21:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
It's impossible that 6 *different colored and in each hunters colors* pieces of the Oubilliete broke off and went perfectly straight in unison. There is no doubt they survived, they might have gotten their "life-force" restored when Gorea died or something. Watch the ending for yourself and you will see it clearly.--Zxcvbnm 21:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Why is that impossible? Ok, if it makes you feel better,I have beaten the game and I will look at this video again. But until then, I say the hunters died. KdogDS 22:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE IN LOVE WITH THE HUNTERS DOESN'T MEAN THEY HAVE TO LIVE!!! I AM A BIG FAN OF TRACE MYSELF, AND I STILL SAY HE DIED!!! KdogDS 20:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm not a fanboy, I'm just stating what is true. The ending SHOWS THE SHIPS ESCAPING, and they look exactly the same as the "landing" cutscene when you first go to Oubilliette. It might look like they died, but they did survive.--Zxcvbnm 21:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Let's ask nintendo or something. It doesn't really matter if they died or not. I won't post it anymore. I'll beleive what I want to believe, not what the world beleives. I'll only truly say they survived if they appear in another Metroid game. KdogDS 02:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
When you enter Oubilliete, you see those 6 coloured "orbs" also enter the space station and also get a peek at another Hunter's ship. Likewise, when you escape, those same 6 fly away in their separate directions.
The Hunters are alive.
The objects under discussion have different colors: 3 of them are Red, Blue, and Green. This would represent Trace, Sylux, and Weavel, respectively.

[edit] Proof the hunters survived

Watch this movie

  • I've watched all those movies on my own DS. That is not proof the hunterrs survived. Here's what else those different colored "ships" could be. Now think: Gorea sucked up the energies from the six hunters. They just fell down. Without doing anything. And those "ships" that are in the final movie? Gorea had copied the abilities from the hunters, and the hunters' weapons have the same color as the hunters themselves. Gorea blew up. Maybe those 6 different colored "ships" were just Gorea's energy flying away. He blew up, so stuff flies away. Also, how could the hunters have gotten away without us noticing? Plus, the hunters wouldn't have ran away. They would have fought to the death. The hunters never really saw, Gorea. They just say streaks coming up to take their energy, then everything went black. So, they still don't know what the ultimate power is. Noxus would not let the ultimate power fall to the hands of the unworthy (like Samus, in Noxus' point of view). I say the hunters died. KdogDS 20:08, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Look, they proved that the hunters survived, I read about it somewhere else. But think: if the hunters woke up when Gorea died, and the ship was about to blow up, they would have gotten out of there as soon as possible, right? No sense in dying for no reason. That's the most plausible explanation. And then Samus warped away, so the hunters wouldn't know where to look for her, but that doesn't even matter since the game doesn't show anything after that. Besides, the ultimate power was destroyed, and the hunters DID see Gorea - at least before it copied their weapons. They don't know about the Omega Cannon, but even that was taken by Samus, so there was nothing left to fight over.--Zxcvbnm 21:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Um, I just thought I might ad that a lore in Hunters says that victims of Gorea that survived felt lifeless and hollow. Perhaps this is what happened?

At 2:46, if you pause the screen, you can see a ship. With windows. Right as all the other 6 streaks go. They survived. If you're thinking that Gorea killed them: he sucked out their energy. That's why they shook when he had them entangled, liek a vacuum pump. When he died, the energy was released. That's what happens in EVERY METROID game when the final boss sucks up energy-Metroid Prime, Metroid Prime 2, etc. The energy is always released, and destroys the final area. Besides, the Alimbics managed to come back to congratulate Samus, and they've been gone for eons.

[edit] Geemers

What game did Geemers first appear in?--Zxcvbnm 02:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, they are in MEtroid Prime: Hunters, but I geuss they are also in Metroid Prime. I would say they first appeared in Metroid Prime, but I AM NOT SURE.--KdogDS 03:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

They first appeared in the original Metroid. They were just red Zoomers.--Rekameohs 16:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The hunters.

At least we know all the hunters had reasons to live.

Sylux-The GFed+Samus still exists. Noxus-He still has the Vhozon values to uphold. Trace-He had the greatest reason, although he didn't get the ultimate power he has found 2 planets and 2 space stations for the Kriken Empire. Spire-Still wants to find out about his people. Kanden-KILL!!! Weavel-Himself, probably.

The "ships" that left as the Oublitte exploded did not have the same colors as the ones that came in. I can admit that. AT LEAST NOT ALL OF THEM. Maybe not all the hunters survived. Most were yellow, or maybe the animators were to lazy to color them. This is a real possibility, look at movie #9 on the movies page, Samus' ass plate looks all pixelated like she's exposing herself lol. Among other things. Anyhoo, on the hunters waking up...Since the various glowing body/suit parts never went out, they might have never died. And these dudes have a resolve that is insane or bordeline insane. Sure they could get up, considering none of them are human. It's possible. But, they could have killed each other, whether their weapons were taken or copied. But one of those ships that left was blue, so my man Sylux lived.

Your fanon reasonings annoy me. Kanden is the only Hunter with questionable mental faculties.

[edit] Descriptions of creatures

I thought it might be a good idea to add descriptions to all of the creatures, or at least images to give readers a better sense of what the creature appears like.

Absolutely. Doing so makes it all the more encyclopedic. I'll get on the ones I know I can do shortly.-Niroht 23:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank You. I will also do what I can to help. Hey, can someone give a description for the alimbics and add it to their section (the alimbics being a important race)? Also, does anybody have a description of the incinerator drone from metroid prime? Those are two that I cannot add descriptions for. I'll make a list soon of the creatures that still need descriptions.

Yeah, I was looking at the incinerator drone part....it's kinda nondescript, but I think I can whip something up....okay, done. I kinda went and redid that entire part while I was at it. It looks much better now, I think.Niroht 18:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

I added a picture of Crocomire in the Super Metroid section. I thought people might want to look at his ugly self. Also same with the sporespawn. Roxas 01:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rippers or Flobeetles

I deleted "Flobeetle" from the Ripper section and changed it back, but are they called that? I thought they were calle "Rippers.--Zxcvbnm 23:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)"

I've never heard them called "Flobeetles" before, but I have heard Rippers. If other people haven't heard the name much, I'd say keep the name as Rippers and note that they're sometimes also known as Flobeetles.--Niroht 15:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Luminoth to add?

Does anyone think it is somewhat neccassary(spellcheck?) to add the Dark Luminoth into the list of creatures, even though it didn't appear in the final version of Echoes?

You could add it to Luminoth, but not the list of creatures as it is not really a creature, but a type of Luminoth.--Zxcvbnm 15:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

That makes sence. Thanx. -MF14

I know this conversation is probably closed, but what the heck is a DARK Luminoth? Are you saying that Nintendo had Ing versions of the freakishly tall mothmen in the Beta version?!? DcPimp

Yeah, just look at this: DarkLuminoth.jpg

That was it? I always thought that was U-Mos with shadows around him. Huh. Weird. --DcPimp


Um, I'm pretty sure that was confirmed to just be an early model of U-mos that was later changed because it looked too evil.. --Dazuro

[edit] What about Corruption?

This could just be me, but I don't think we need the new enemies from Metroid Prime 3 just yet. I mean, except for Rundus (who we know diddly about), we may as well just hold off until someone kicks every enemy's backside after it's release and has reliable information. But, it could just be me. --DcPimp
Added some recently. -MF14

So your the one responsible! Look, I'm just saying that until we know more about the game we should hold off. --DcPimp

I agree with DcPimp. The game hasn't been released yet, and as we know from Fable things could change a lot. I fixed the inappropriate person and stuff in those, but that was part of my mission, not an endorsement. Let's not put any more enemies from Corruption until we knnow for certain how they'll operate. --Niroht 13:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Is it too early to ask if Rundus and Noxus are related? I know I said WE don't much about him, but I really meant I don't know much. (Yes, I am ashamed to call myself a fanboy now.) DcPimp

Should we get rid of or combine the entries of the Sentry Drones (and Land Mine)? Since there will be probably a lot more of them in the whole game, we don't want one entry per drone, it'd be too many entries... -MF14

At the moment, I'd say just leave it alone. Since they are the only known enemies other than Rundus, it's fine for now. Speaking of Rundus, no one has told me if he and Noxus are related yet. Am I the only one that heard that?!? --DcPimp

[edit] What About the Mermen?

I know you've probably read the Space Pirate article, and I know that this article and it are completely different, but since the Mermen Pirates are actually X Parasites, shouldn't they be under the Metroid Fusion creatures list? --DcPimp

Yes, they should be. They're not? If so, feel free to put it there. --Niroht 15:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

It's been taken care of. Mermen are now officially Metroid Fusion Creatures. --DcPimp

[edit] Anybody got an original Fusion creature?

I've noticed that most of the creatures people would find in Fusion are already on the list under either Metroid II or Super Metroid. So, does anbody know any creature in Fusion that didn't appear in those two? Just send the creatures name and a general description here, and I should be able to figure out what you're talking about. Just leave it to me. --DcPimp

Just a curiousity (hope I spelled that right) question: Since the X Ridley is noticably different from the real Ridley, would it be a Fusion original, or just another incarnation of Ridley? DcPimp 16:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
It's just another incarnation of Ridley. However, it is actually a clone since the real Ridley was sucked dry by the X. Actually, all Ridleys are clones since he has gotten killed many times, therefore that's the only possible explanation. --Zxcvbnm 22:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
We don't know that. Apparently, some portion of him survived his first battle with Samus to be mechanized in Prime(The robot at the end of Zero Mission doesn't count; it had no organic matter). Those two had to be the same Ridley ; a Logbook entry states that he has been "reconstructed", and that requires that enough of his body was left over to build onto and he was still alive throughout the process. Plus, if you will recall, he fell into Phazon in Prime and a screenshot of Corruption shows him with what appears to be Phazon on his wings. Any Metroid fan should know the powers of Phazon are quite great, but not fully understood. How do we know he didn't survive that fall and, through mutation, gained the ability to regenerate? And he's supposed to be the last true Zebesian, which we know are not the Space Pirates. How do we know that's not one of that races abilities? Think about it. I mean, as far as I'm concerned, the X Ridley is the only cloned Ridley. --DcPimp 23:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Meta Ridley was totally destroyed in Metroid Prime. How did they get him back for Super Metroid, and then get ANOTHER Ridley on the BSL? Ridley couldn't have regenerated from that.--Zxcvbnm 12:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Meta Ridley wasn't totally destroyed. I've beat that game about 19 times, and I've seen that cutscene a lot. He's still in one piece when he falls over the edge. As for BSL, he's leading an attack on a Federation base in Corruption, right? How do we know he didn't leave some genetic material (bloodstains, skin rubbing off onthings, etc) behind, and the Federation found it? But, more importantly, how did we go from my sinple question about X Ridley's originality to an argument over whether it's the same Ridley in the other games? ---DcPimp 16:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Derbeetle?

Why does the Beetle article say they're called Derbeetles in the title, but almost nowhere else in the article? And, more, importantly, are they called Derbeetles? My version of Prime says Beetle. --DcPimp 19:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Because it was vandalism. If you see something like that, feel free to fix it. Be Bold! --Niroht 11:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah,yeah,yeah. I know all about being bold. I just like a second opinion. ---DcPimp 12:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Okay then. Yeah, it was vandalism. That kinda thing almost always means vandlism. --Niroht 12:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More from DcPimp

How long do we want this article to be? Just a curiosity question. You see, every creature in the entire Metroid universe is listed on the Metroid Galaxy Guide, and if we put all the missing ones from that list on this page, we'd have a complete list. On the other hand, the page would be so long it would be ridiculous. Does anybody have a suggestion? --DcPimp 12:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

If it gets to be a problem, we can probably split it into games or something. Wikipedia is supposed to be a repository of all human knowledge after all.--Niroht 16:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
That makes sense. But, uh, how do we do that quickly? Once again, my ignorance probably speaks for itself, but how do we just send a section of one article elsewhere and make it an article itself? More importantly, would that kind of thing bug people, having to go to a different article for every game? --DcPimp 00:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I think there might be a precedent, but I haven't been around too long, so I don't know. We'll see when we get there I suppose. --Niroht 00:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Uh, define "precedent". Don't get me wrong; I know what it means, but what kind of precedent are you talking about? DcPimp 00:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I think splitting it out is perfectly fine: we can leave this as a disambiguation page and link it to everything else. We could include multiple games in a single article as well (Creatures in the Metroid series, Metroid to Super Metroid) or something.--Zxcvbnm 02:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Well, all this sounds good and all, but there is still one other thing that worries me: the article creator. I know nobody owns an article, but we still might need to take it up with him. --DcPimp 12:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Okay, it's been three days, and nobody has done anything with this page! Nobody's edited, talked about it, and from what I can tell, nobody's making the suggested separated articles. What is going on?!? --DcPimp 00:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The problem is, what types of articles do we split it into? One article per game, or 2 articles, each with half the games in them?--Zxcvbnm 03:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh. Yeah, that would be a problem. I think we should split it up like this:
     *Creatures from Metroid, Metroid Zero Mission, and Metroid II
     *Creatures from Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion
     *Creatures from Metroid Prime and MP: Hunters
     *Creatures from MP2: Echoes and (once it's released) MP3: Corruption
But, that's just me. --DcPimp 12:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree with DcPimp, but it should be More like,

     *Creatures from Metroid, Metroid Zero Mission, and Metroid II
     *Creatures from Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion
     *Creatures from Metroid Prime and MP2: Echoes
     *Creatures from  MP: Hunters and (once it's released) MP3: Corruption

It might be a little more sutible, or better yet, for each system, Like this:

     *Creatures from Metroid, and Super Metroid 
     *Creatures from Metroid Zero Mission, Metroid II,MP: Hunters and, and Metroid Fusion
     *Creatures from Metroid Prime, MP2: Echoes, and (once it's released) MP3: Corruption

That might be a little easier then the other ways...

Those are some good suggestions, but I really think we should try to organize by the game timeline. At any rate, Zero Mission and the original should go together if nothing else. --DcPimp 23:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

If we are following the timeline, it should be something like

  • Creatures from Metroid, Zero Mission, and Metroid Prime
  • Creatures from Metroid Prime Hunters, Metroid Prime 2, and Metroid Prime 3 (once released)
  • Creatures from Metroid 2, Super Metroid, and Fusion

That at least follows the timeline, and has 3 games in each, which is 2 thirds less then it would be if we had all the games together, and it is balanced. (11987 03:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC))

Hey, 11987 proposed a pretty darn good organization . I'll vote for it for now. --DcPimp 12:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
No, I think that it should be in real-world order since we'd have to accomodate for any new games made in between.--Zxcvbnm 02:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok then, how about something like this?
  • Metroid, Metroid 2, Super Metroid
  • Metroid Prime, Metroid Fusion, Metroid Zero Mission
  • Metroid Prime 2, Metroid Prime Hunters, Metroid Prime 3 (once released)

What Zxcvbnm said makes sense, so this order should be more accomodating and will make sure we wont have to go back and make page changes if the metroid series goes back in time like it did in the Prime series and zero mission. (11987 08:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC))

I like that one. I say we go with it. --Niroht 12:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that idea might be best as well....Man, I'm confused! I like both organizations. You guys just pick which one it'll be. --DcPimp 12:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Im almost ready to split the article, but i have 2 questions:

  • Where do the main characters (Samus, Chozo, Metroid ect...) go? Do they go where they first appear, or is that section deleted, or what?
  • And, (this one is a little stupid but i still need to know) do we write the full names of the game titles (such as metroid prime 2 echoes) or something like (metroid prime 2)? If u guys can answer these questions, i can start splitting the pages. (11987 14:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC))
We could have something like the menus on MP2E, with categories or something, like
  • Metroid
    • Flying
      • Shriekbat
      • Ripper
    • Crawling
      • Zoomer
      • Sidehopper
    • Bosses
      • Kraid
      • Ridley
      • Mother Brain
  • Super Metroid
    • Flying
      • Flying Bad guy
    • Crawling
      • Crawling bad guy
    • Bosses
      • Queen Metroid

And etc. for all the other metroid games. Yeah, this is tough... I liked the one where we go by the game timeline, but we'll have internal links to each individual game's creatures page, right? DcPimp is right, this is confusing! DarkLink Metroid 05:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Yo, 11987, I've got your answer. All these pages will be accessed from a disambiguation page, right? Well, we leave the first paragraph (the one about how major characters get there own articles) on the disambig. page and put the links to those articles there. Simple as heck. Oh, and you could probably just use shortened names forthe longer game titles. Everybody that visits the page should know what its talking about. --DcPimp 13:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Alright thanks alot DcPimp, I just split the pages. You can check them out under the names Creatures in Metroid, Metroid II, and Super Metroid, Creatures in Metroid Prime, Metroid Fusion, and Zero Mission, and Creatures in Metroid Prime 2, Metroid Prime Hunters, and Metroid Prime 3(sorry that i can't link them to the page, but just copy paste those names and search; you should be able to find them). All I basically did was copy and paste, add titles that correspond with the articles and wrote almost the same opening sentance for each articles. So check them out, fix what needs to be fixed or do whatever needs to be done. I haven't got rid of this page yet and wont until the other pages have been checked. For now, im just going to add the external links and referneces to all the pages. If anyone disagrees, just edit it. (11987 18:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC))

Alright i got another question. The new split articles are pretty much unknown to the public. How do i add it to the metroid series box at the bottom of metroid articles? If its not added there, the pages will be completley unkonown. Thanks. (11987 16:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC))

Well, um, never mind, its already happened. A big thanks to zxcvbnm for making the disambiguation page and adding the articles to the metroid series box. Thanks again everyone. (11987 23:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC))

I added it to the template and made this page a disambig.--Zxcvbnm 23:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zoomer or Geemer?

Is the Geemer different from the Zoomer or is it just another name for the Zoomer? The main Geemer article which was merged into here said it was the same.--Zxcvbnm 03:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

According to the Logbook from Prime, Geemers are a subspecies of Zoomers, so while they are very similar, they're not the same. --DcPimp 12:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Video, and New Creatures

[1]

That is the link to a video where several creatures are shown. Many of them are new, and there is what seems to be a new hunter.

No names are given for anything in that video. We need names if we're gonna add them. --DcPimp 12:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other Metroids

Anyone know if there is another Metroid coming out other than Prime 3?

Dude, that's completely unrelated to the article. Go to a forum or something and ask that. But, in answer to your question, it doesn't look real likely. Dread has been "confirmed" and denied so many times, you can't put any stock in it. And as far as I know, that is the only rumored Metroid game that is still floating around out there. --DcPimp 22:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't intend to post that.

No other Metroid game has been confirmed right now, but it's highly unlikely that no more will be made after MP3 considering it's one of their best selling series. Also, the only "confirmation" of Metroid Dread was it's inclusion in a list of games NP printed over a year ago and since then they have never mentioned it. TJ Spyke 05:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pinball

Does Pinball have any unique creatures? How about the cow?

One creature does not an entire section make. Course, I just hated Pinball, so what do I know? --DcPimp 13:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree- Pinball is not canon, and this page is for UNIQUE creatures introduced by the Metroid series.--Zxcvbnm 13:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding this page

Since we've split the pages up, do we want to have individual talk pages for each article, or do we want to keep all related conversation here? --DcPimp 14:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Categories

  • Creatures in Metroid, Metroid II, and Super Metroid
  • Creatures in Metroid Prime, Metroid Fusion, and Zero Mission
  • Creatures in Metroid Prime 2, Metroid Prime Hunters, and Metroid Prime 3

So that is how the pages are split up? Well, the categories are good I guess. But MPH creatures are in both MP2E-MP3C and in MP-MZM. Which category should we take out MPH creatures? -MF14

MPH creatures belong with metroid prime 2 and metroid prime 3. It goes in between. (11987 16:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC))

Yeah. Besides, a lot of creatures are unique to MPH, so we can't erase the category. --DcPimp 14:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Seriously, if there are THAT many creatures in the Metroid series, rather than listing them by games, why don't we just list them from A-Z like how the creatures articles from Final Fantasy are organized. That's just my suggestion, I just think listing the creatures in which game they appear is too clunky and complicated for readers who don't know the series well. Samusfan80 23:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. Its prety simple; if ur looking for a creature, go to the section where the game is. Besides, we've already split the pages; couldn't you have told us this earlier? I want it to stay. (11987 23:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Found A Complaint/Suggestion

Click here. It's one line of stuff. We might want to take it to heart. --DcPimp 15:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

The one major problem with this is its is NOT all the creatures in the prime series. The first prime is not on that page, and we have agreed to split the pages according to release date. So i disagree. I believe the current title should stay. (11987 16:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC))

Good point. I should've thought of that before I brought it up. Sorry. --DcPimp 18:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Keeping track of the pages

Has anybody else found that with the page split, it's easier to fix problems but harder to keep up with the editing? I've been able to reverse a couple of vandalized sections with the splits help, but usually another page would've been struck while I was working. --DcPimp 18:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scans to add?

For the creatures in the Prime series, should we ad their scans to their section? (11987 22:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC))

Nope. We'd violate some copyright, I'm sure. --DcPimp 02:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Allright. (11987 02:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Can someone add the GF to the Metrod box thingy?

I didnt know where to put it, so ill ask here. Can someone add Galactic Federation to the Metroid series box? I dont know how, and dont know where I can learn stuff like that, making links, posting pics ect...(11987 01:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC))

I'm not even sure we can. While most of the article is about Metroid's GF, some of it is about F-Zero and a little bitty section is about something else. We'd be including something with reference to multiple categories into one category. --DcPimp 13:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Yah we can now that the sections are gone not metroid related. (11987 22:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC))

Um, okay...yeah, sure, go for it. --DcPimp 17:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

But I personally dont know how. Ill wait for someone who can to do it. (11987 17:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC))

never mind; i did it myself! (11987 18:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC))

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/r/e/Talk%7ECreatures_in_the_Metroid_series_fcea.html"