Talk:Crackdown
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Fixed trivia
The previous trivia stated that Crackdown and Gears of War were both developed by Microsoft. Gears of War was developed by Epic games and Crackdown was developed by Realtime Worlds. Both games were pubished by Microsoft but that is irrelevant as to what the developer puts in the game so instead of correcting it, I simply deleted the entire phrase.
[edit] Article needs update.
The game was released yesterday. 151.188.16.17 12:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC) I bought a preorder, which had a sticker on it for the retailer stating, "do not release until Febuary 20, 2007."
[edit] Crackdown and Crackdown (video game) articles need history merging
There are 2 almost identical crackdown articles. One which is just plain Crackdown and another that's subtitled (video game). This is possibly due to the disambiguation page. Either way, one of these needs to be deleted, or the two articles need to be merged. VerasGunn 11:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crackdown disambiguation page
I don't think the disambig is needed, since police action refers to politics (like some people say Vietnam was a police action. The page has nothing to with Police cracking down on drugs. I say we move it back.
[edit] Controversy
Does anyone know if there is a source for this: Jack Thompson mistakenly said Microsoft was selling crack, when he heard about Crackdown. Obviously Jack Thompson did not know Crackdown was a game.[citation needed]
No, that's probably just rhetoric. Thompson isn't a smart person, but he isn't an idiot either. Master Deusoma
- I agree. I doubt anyone would be that dumb, espically, conisdering the word crackdown is farliy common and its meaning is not even remotly close to that of the drug. --70.48.175.35 23:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Title
"Crackdown" should be where the government stops crime. That is the common usage. Skinnyweed 18:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think that'd be more of a "crack down". TFX 01:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Features
In my opinion, the features list reads more like an advertisement, or the back of a box than an encyclopaedia article, I would change it but I don't know enough about the game. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.1.140.5 (talk) 14:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC).
I'd vote for a rewrite as well. It does indeed look more like what you'd find in an ad for the game than a normal WP-article. 85.165.162.169 02:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, that's some nauseating ad-speak there. -- El benito 22:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Fourth'd. "Legendary Game Designer"? "Incredible Over-the-Top Action"? That's too much for an article on a game that's already been released and critically acclaimed, let alone one that's coming in two months. --Kleptonis 08:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
It's copied from http://crackdownoncrime.com/ThisIsCrackdown/crackdown_overview.htm. I'd delete it immediatly without feeling the need to replace it with anything, but since there's a discussion going on...80.203.53.26 16:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Added the advert template, tried to add it to the features list but it overlapped the box to the right badly. Editorinchimp 20:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
EVERY disk of crackdown is a key to the Halo 3 multiplay beta download. This is point proven by the offical crackdown site. And if you cant trust the people who are making the game who can you trust?
http://crackdownoncrime.com/News/Halo3_Announcement.htm - The Halo announcement on the offical site.
UNLESS PEOPLE START CLEANING UP THIS ARTICLE SO IT DOESN'T READ LIKE AN ADVERTISEMENT, THEN I'M DELETING HALF THE ENTRY. THKY
Actually, no you won't THKY. Also I'll thank you to not type in all caps as it is rude, akin to yelling, and it makes you sound like a moron. CharlieFandango
[edit] Map
The article states "game starts with one portion of Pacific city open to the player.". Is this true? I'm sure I read that the whole city is open from the beginning (I'll look for the source later today) Brooza 11:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
The entire map is open but the narrator recommends not entering the other two islands until you build your skills up.
You cannot get to the other two parts of the city from the Agency tower/garage right off the bat. You can take the above ground bridges but technically you are only really supposed to be on the one section (La Mugre Island) from the very beginning and move on to the others from there after you progress on La Mugre. Raj O Mac 10:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Engines
As the demo is currently available on XBL, it should be noted that the engines are Havok for physics (already noted) and Renderware for engine rendering. I'm not sure what it was, but there was a logo for another engine (that's what it could be, at least) under the Havok logo and next to the Bink logo before the game started. I'll probably start up the demo and look into the company in a bit. (Nbmatt 18:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC))
- Alright, cool, someone fixed it. :) (Nbmatt 03:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Vandalism
Vandalism by Special:Contributions/66.30.39.181 removed. I suggest this article be locked from non-Wiki editors. JAF1970 19:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
The Potiential Failure portion is not a valid argument. It actually does not state anything to failure. Please remove/or change title of the portion.
[edit] Article title
The history of this article is a bit of a mess. This is what I can work out:
The article was created in May 2006 at the title Crackdown. On January 23, 2007 (early on the 24th in the Eastern hemisphere), the article was moved to Crackdown (game), and then twelve hours later, moved again to Crackdown (video game), a more appropriately disambiguated title. Crackdown was turned into a disambiguation page.
About a day later, WikiMan78 pasted the contents of the article back into Crackdown, replacing the dab page with a duplicate of the article. This was basically a cut-and-paste move without the "cut", because the article was still intact at Crackdown (video game).
For the next two weeks, both articles were edited, acquiring independent histories, until the copy at Crackdown (video game) - the one attached to the pre-January 23 history - was changed on February 7 into a redirect to the pasted copy at Crackdown, which is missing most of its history. Since then, all edits have been to the copy at Crackdown.
In order to patch up the history, we'll definitely need to merge the May '06 - January '07 history from Crackdown (video game) with the February 7-18 history from Crackdown. I'm not sure which version of the January 23 - February 7 history is preferable; they seem pretty parallel, with some of the same people making the same edits to both pages.
Can someone tell me whether I've basically got the story right, and make a case for what the name of the article ought to be? Once that's decided, and we pick which history to keep for the two weeks of duplication, I can merge the histories properly at whichever title is chosen. -GTBacchus(talk) 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- I haven't been watching this page, but I think "Crackdown" should be a disambig page and the game should be at "Crackdown (video game)". TJ Spyke 08:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- But there is nothing to disambiguate. The only article dealing with the word Crackdown is this one. There is also a link to wiktionary.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.197.192.130 (talk • contribs).
- Yes there is, I wouldn't expect you to admit that though since you caused part of this whole problem (by redirecting Crackdown (video game) to here). TJ Spyke 22:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- The disambiguation page previously in place at Crackdown was actually problematic, because it directed readers to police action, which really isn't the same as a "crackdown". If there's to be a dab page at Crackdown, we should decide on a more appropriate target for the common-language meaning of "crackdown". -GTBacchus(talk) 22:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't having the wiktionary link satisfy the common language meaning of crackdown?
- The disambiguation page previously in place at Crackdown was actually problematic, because it directed readers to police action, which really isn't the same as a "crackdown". If there's to be a dab page at Crackdown, we should decide on a more appropriate target for the common-language meaning of "crackdown". -GTBacchus(talk) 22:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes there is, I wouldn't expect you to admit that though since you caused part of this whole problem (by redirecting Crackdown (video game) to here). TJ Spyke 22:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- But there is nothing to disambiguate. The only article dealing with the word Crackdown is this one. There is also a link to wiktionary.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.197.192.130 (talk • contribs).
[edit] About Gears
I've seen a few bits of trivia added to this page implying that various things in Crackdown are references to Gears of War, like the cogwheel imagery seen all over the place in the Den looking like the COG logo from Gears, or the movements of the Shi-Gen's mutants being similar to the way Wretches move. Well I'd just like to make this perfectly clear: Gears of War was made by Epic Games, Crackdown was made by Realtime Worlds. As far as I know, neither have anything at all to do with each other, apart from both being Xbox 360 games. Someone was looking for a reference. Master Deusoma 07:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The Agents armor also looks similar to the Gears armor...IT'S A CONSPIRACY!
[edit] Adding a video
http://gamevideos.com/video/id/8607. It's a roundtable discussion with a few of the editors from 1UP and EGM. It would be a good addition to the info page.
-Jay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jayfresh006 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Game completion question
- I have a question concerning the completion of the game. I have been able to bring all of my skills to a 4 star rating however i never maxed them out. I have now defeated all three gangs but since I need to kill enemies in order to increase certain skills (specifically firearms, explosives, and strength) will i be able to now that there is no one left to fight. The only other solution is to find the Hidden orbs but i don't think my skills will be completely maxed once i find them all. -- Unsigned
- Talk pages shouldn't be used as a general forum, but the quick answer is that you can start/continue the city with 'crime on', no bosses but enemies will be there to. --Masem 03:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
