From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Alleged theft 1.1 CONCLUSION: 2 Timeline 2.1 Good job Derex

[edit] Alleged theft

I reverted the edits because this page is for what the cox report said. Writing alleged is extremely POV, amatuer, and unencyclopedic. If you leave alleged we should just delete this article because it would be pointless to have. Secondly when I removed alleged that is not sayting that they actually stole the documents. That is only saying that according to the cox report they stole the documents.

Did the report not say that they stole the documents? This alleged is ridiculous. Secondly I left this:

Final report conclusions summarized While several groups, including the People's Republic of China, contend that the Report is overstated or inaccurate, its authors and supporters maintain that its gist is undeniable. The report's basic findings were as follows, quoted from the above document's opening summary: The People's Republic of China (PRC) has stolen design information on the United States' most advanced thermonuclear weapons. The Select Committee judges that the PRC's next generation of thermonuclear weapons, currently under development, will exploit elements of stolen U.S. design information. PRC penetration of our national nuclear weapons laboratories spans at least the past several decades and almost certainly continues today. The PRC has stolen or otherwise illegally obtained U.S. missile and space technology that improves PRC military and intelligence capabilities.

Then I didn't remove the part of the article that went over Chinas response:

China's response In response, the PRC has maintained that its nuclear technology was indigenously developed and was not the result of espionage.

[edit] CONCLUSION:

The cox report says that China stole the documents and China denies it. = Reader draws their own conclusions. What you reverted makes the article:

1. -confusing
2. -innaccurate
3. -And makes it sound like it was written by a teenager.

Again my changes didn't say that China stole the documents they only said that the Cox report said they stole the documents. 71.131.229.32 19:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Your comments would carry more weight if you registered. I believe deletions by anonymous users can be summarily reverted. -- Petri Krohn 15:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Timeline

Instead of using a jpg image that cannot be further edited, it should be changed into regular wiki paragraph formatting or a table at least. Yay or Nay?--Hypo 06:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Nay. You can edit it. Go to Template:GovernmentNotification‎. --Jayzel 19:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good job Derex

Nice clean-up job, Derex.--Jayzel 19:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)