Talk:Covance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Neutrality

FYI: POV tag was added by User:Idleguy saying not neutral. caveat: I'm not a fan of any corporation nor do I like animal torture. but this article is more on their torture and less on the company!

I basically agree that it could have more info on the company. However the company does get publicity mostly through its scandals, keeping low profile otherwise. Therefore I do not think that the weighting is that wrong. Maybe someone could find some more info on the company profile. -- Ravn 17:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree, and I removed it because we don't allow drive-by tagging. Editors who want to tag it have to say here what needs to be changed exactly, and the changes have to be consistent with our policies. Anyone who thinks it needs more information on the company should simply add some. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Do you really think that the weighting of an article should be determined by a company's "publicity"? Is that what an encyclopedia is about? --Wikismile 19:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Covance's reaction

Has Covance issued any statements in defense? It seems like such a large company should say something about all these allegations. Is there any more information about the lawsuit? Gary 18:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)