Talk:Cosmo's Cosmic Adventure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Kirby Super Star Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

Thank you, you guys, I am sort of new to Wikipedia and sometimes I don't know how to format pages.

[edit] Duke Nuk?m

Should we call him Duke Nukem or Duke Nukum?

At the time when Cosmo was made, he was called Nukum. But now everybody knows him as Nukem. Calvero2 15:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The original, real, and final name is Duke Nukem. It was called Nukum for a time (but originally it was still Nukem), but I don't think that matters much. I think the real character and game name should be used, Nukem. The commentary and reference there are enough.Sega381 15:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unreferenced?

I'm not sure why this article is marked as unreferenced. What reference does it need (as of now, considering the information it has) but the game itself? I thought that non-verifiable things needed referecing, not easily verifiable ones. And if there is something that needs a reference, it should be marked as such. Otherwise, I think the tag should be removed.Sega381 20:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)