Talk:Cosmic entities
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Proposed split
I'd suggest dividing this in half, by company - so that the Marvel Universe cosmic beings get one article and the DC Universe beings get another. Opinions? Suggestions for names for the new articles are also welcome--Mrph 20:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Split --Mrph 20:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Split - Cosmic being (DC Comics) and Cosmic being (Marvel) being obcious split with a disambig type page at current seems most obvious. - Waza 06:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Split - ...into Cosmic entities (DC Comics) and Cosmic entities (Marvel Comics) with a disambig type page Cosmic entities and the following redirect pages:
-
- Cosmic entity (DC Comics) -> Cosmic entities (DC Comics)
- Cosmic beings (DC Comics) -> Cosmic entities (DC Comics)
- Cosmic being (DC Comics) -> Cosmic entities (DC Comics)
- Cosmic entity (Marvel Comics) -> Cosmic entities (Marvel Comics)
- Cosmic beings (Marvel Comics) -> Cosmic entities (Marvel Comics)
- Cosmic being (Marvel Comics) -> Cosmic entities (Marvel Comics)
- Cosmic entity -> Cosmic entities
- Cosmic beings -> Cosmic entities
- Cosmic being -> Cosmic entities
- Weapon X (de) 13:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
[edit] Decision
Closed with a decision to split - Cosmic entities (Marvel Comics) and Cosmic entities (DC Comics) seem to be the best names. There's already a List of DC Comics cosmic entities and a List of Marvel cosmic beings - but Infinity Gauntlet collectively calls 'em "cosmic entities" at least once, so I suspect that's the better choice. My reading of the page naming / plurals discussion is that "entities" is more appropriate than "entity" in this case. Opinions? --Mrph 11:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)