User talk:Coryarlo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Coryarlo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Just Heditor review 00:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Ririe, Idaho page

Creative Writing http://www.class.uidaho.edu/english/CW/ A Dictionary. A Thesaurus. A Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. Have no interest in your religious affiliation, nor your sexual orientation. Hope this helps.Tinosa 18:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

That does help, thankyou. Now that I see you're actively trying to improve your writing by taking classes, I feel more confident your edits will improve. Hopefully you'll also find time next semester at U of I to take Interpersonal Communications. --Coryarlo 19:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 01:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies!

Hi, Coryarlo, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve LGBT-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.
  • Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, peer review and a project-wide article collaboration, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, Jumpaclass, so please consider signing up there.
  • If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics.
  • If you're planning to stay, have a square in our quilt! You can put anything you want in it.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

-- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 02:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Page Protection

I think the proper procedure is to visit WP:RFP. But I've left a note on User talk:WJBscribes page regarding this and s/he's already protected it. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


Welcome to WikiProject Czech Republic!
Hi, and welcome to the Czech Republic WikiProject!
  • We are the project collecting, improving and maintaining articles related to the Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia, medieval Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia and Samo's Empire
  • Please feel free to add membership userbox on your page {{User WikiProject Czech Republic}}
  • If you spot any article within the scope of our project please add our tag {{WikiProject Czech Republic}} on its talk page
  • In case of any questions use talk page of our project
  • We wish you happy editing !
  • ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 08:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

==Question== Dear Dr. Coryarlo,

We're both MD's. What do you think of making contributions to something else in wikipedia? You've made edits that are not medically related. Earlier today, I made a comment about the John Edwards (running for president).

There seems to be a fight going on there about Mrs. Edwards' cancer. John Edwards said (and I paraphrase) that the cancer is "completely treatable" and likened it to diabetes (probably because both are not curable, but treatable).

Some argue that Edwards is being deceptive and putting too much of a spin. There was a mention that being misleading is potentially harmful to the public because someone else with breast cancer might misunderstand and think that her prognosis is good. They even wanted to put grim prognosis numbers. Some others thought that "original research" and "soapboxing" is not permitted in wikipedia and they wanted to put just the info from the glossy Edwards press reports.

I take a neutral stance in between.

The problem I see is that is it potentially bad to write about this type of comment? Some doctors in wikipedia stick to medicine but others do not. I don't want to get into a fight between a bunch of Democrats and Republicans. Is this a concern among you, that is, editing outside of medicine?

Best regards, Frank (Doc United States) Here's the link [1] My part is near or at the bottom called "A Response from a Physician". What do you think about this?Doc United States 22:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)</a>

"Doc United States" has been found by checkuser to be a sockpuppet of User:Dereks1x and has been indefinitely blocked. Tvoz |talk 20:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

[edit] LGBT WikiProject newsletter

SatyrBot 05:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)