Talk:Cornell Law School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Revision
how does this page look —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cornell010 (talk • contribs).
-
- Don't copy text from a source, that is plagiarism. Use multiple sources to write an article.
- Always log in if you have an account.
- Always sign your comments. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 18:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- But, you have to admit the library section really blows.--Cornell010 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but you can't plagiarize. The library section should be expanded... just go through the source and rewrite the section (from scratch) around it. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I was wondering, if we cited the source, then would it still be plagiarism? I am asking this because, on some other wikipedia pages I have seen people copy from another source word for word, however, they cited it, and by citing it wouldn't we be recognizing the source, thus not commmitting plagiarism. Thanks.User:Cornell010 20:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then you're mirroring content which has not been released under a Wikipedia-friendly license and you're not plagiarizing, but instead blatantly infringing on a copyright. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 20:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I see.--Cornell010 20:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, I just re-wrote the Library section, however, I need help with using the same refernce more than once (citing it). I tried to learn from the main Cornell article, where this is done many times, however, I could not get it to work. User:Cornell010 17:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- First instance of the reference: <ref name='something'>{{cite whatever}}</ref>
- All instances after the first: <ref name='something' />
- The somethings have to be the same. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 21:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, I just re-wrote the Library section, however, I need help with using the same refernce more than once (citing it). I tried to learn from the main Cornell article, where this is done many times, however, I could not get it to work. User:Cornell010 17:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I see.--Cornell010 20:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Then you're mirroring content which has not been released under a Wikipedia-friendly license and you're not plagiarizing, but instead blatantly infringing on a copyright. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 20:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I was wondering, if we cited the source, then would it still be plagiarism? I am asking this because, on some other wikipedia pages I have seen people copy from another source word for word, however, they cited it, and by citing it wouldn't we be recognizing the source, thus not commmitting plagiarism. Thanks.User:Cornell010 20:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but you can't plagiarize. The library section should be expanded... just go through the source and rewrite the section (from scratch) around it. -mercuryboardtalk ♠ 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Admissions numbers
There seems to be a problem with the admissions percentages, as the 583 number is the TOTAL number of J.D. students at Cornell. CLS class cohorts are typically 180-200 students in size. So, the applicants compete to be one of the roughly 180-200 students entering in a particular year, not one of 500-600. I'll wait to hear some debate on this, but I will change the numbers soon. Masonpatriot 18:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think the editor also combined yield and acceptance into one mostly useless statistic. —mercuryboardtalk 18:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)