User talk:Consumed Crustacean

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Archive
Archives
1. April 27, 2005 – May 21, 2006
2. May 21, 2006 – August 9, 2006
3. August 9, 2006 – January 14, 2007
WikiDefcon
Severe
High
Elevated
Guarded
Low
Slight reduction now, WP:AIV calming, stay on your toes though.

Contents

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for your help with the Coy disambig.

Candent shlimazel 23:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I disagree

Hello, I disagree with your statement that I cannot link to my own website from my userpage. "it doesn't matter if they're on it or if you simply link to them." According to the WP:USERPAGE It says under removal that:

"Removal If the community lets you know that they would rather you delete some content from your user space, you should consider doing so - such content is only permitted with the consent of the community. After you've been here for a while, and written lots of great articles, the community may be more inclined to let you "get away with it". Alternatively, you could move the content to another site, and link to it." Notice bolded text.

It also says on the page: "You are welcome to include a link to your personal home page, although you should not surround it with any promotional language." No promotional language was on my sight.

So I disagree with your determination and believe that I have a right to link my Wikipedia user page to my own personal website. The rules say I can and the information is not promotional and isn't selling anything. I have contributed many articles and to many articles in this encyclopedia. My page on freemasonry actually was meant to help improve this encyclopedia. I addressed what I believe is some problems with how the articles on freemasonry are being edited and included links and info for possible future inclusion.

I don't want a long drawn out affair over this but as long as I am not advocating violence I should be able to edit the content on my own personal website without interfence and without the link to it being severed since the rules not only say that I can do it but suggest that I should do it. Especially, despite my vast additions to this encyclopedia the members don't want to let me "get away with it".

Also without prodding from anyone I posted a disclaimer that people may be offended by what is on my Non-Wikipedia website. So despite your gut reaction in answer to MsJapans request I think you should reconsider. Since it does not corrolate with what is written in the rules. Wikipedia can't dictate what is written on a personal website after suggesting that I link my page to a personal website.

I have had several vandalizations to my userpage including removing my picture of Jesus and replacing it with a naked teen as well as other things being done to it. This is why I reverted my page so quickly and labeled it as being vandalized. I understand that people may not agree with my beliefs or quotes or whatnot that is why I followed Wikipedia policy and linked it off site. I even warn people that they might be offended so they don't have to go there.

I don't think that I should be singled out for such treatment just because a few Wikipedians are up in arms about my pages. I could go through the vast amounts of user pages and give you examples of polemics that is allowed on Wikipedia or the links off site. But I'd rather not and in good faith would like to be able to link to my own webpage without harrassment as we are allowed to do. You can devise your own warning if you want. Thank you for your time and I hope that this situation can be cleared up, since I moved my page to follow the rules and cool the jets of those so incenced about it. Dwain 04:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Look, there is a difference between moving material off your userpage and linking to it when it's better suited to a blog or personal page, and doing so when it's outright polemic and insulting. I'm mostly concerned with the comments that were on your profile page, including associating paganism with satanism and the like. The existence of others who are doing this isn't justification, and using disclaimers is just Wikilawyering. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RD edit

Hi, did you intend this edit[1] on the ref desk? Better in my opinion to delete both those trolling questions, but i wouldn't do so if another editor had already reverted a prior deletion. Was that your intention, or was it just an edit conflict?—eric 01:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. I meant to revert his addition of a second copy of the question. Remove it all you like, I don't know how that happened :/. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An editor has asked for a deletion review of Skulltag. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Catman847 04:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm asking to have this page restored. i was looking at the debate about it, and whomever asked for it to be deleted was obviously biased.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skulltag

The AfD was posted a few (i'd say 3) MINUTES after it was originally posted. Unless he is EXTREMELY biased against any of these articles, it really isn't possible for it to be deleted unless he was waiting for something like this to happen. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Catman847 (talk • contribs).

It did not close the discussion or speedy it, but ooookay. The time it took to nominate doesn/t really matter, and you can/t claim that every single user in that debate is biased. If you want to try for DRV, go ahead. One has already upheld the deletion, though. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 04:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, right now, seeing as i've never had an article deleted before, i'm not sure what DRV is.... Catman847 04:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Follow the steps [[2]]. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 04:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What is your reason for deleting my Until June page?

oh wait.. there is none... so stop deleting it! --Mister Pine 05:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

It was already deleted through Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Until_June, and is suitable for CSD A7 anyways. If you want to contest it, use the deletion review. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the way I reacted. I know it was already deleted and I didn't agree with that but tried to make it better to repost after going through hours of research on that band. I have no idea what that CSD A7 means. As far as I'm concerned, that article is not even English. If someone is going to delete a page, I think they should at least give a real reason and not blame it on some wikipedia policy. Why is it CSD A7? At least then I might be able to fix it, but I can't repost it now becuase of what you did which wasn't really fair because I didn't see your message until after I reposted it. I won't repost it again until I know it's okay. So, please let me know what I can do to fix it. Also, is it okay to make the page a subpage of my user page until it is correct... if not, I'll delete it because it is already there. --Mister Pine 05:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
A7 is the A7th item on the list, listed under A7. It basically says that the article contains no assertion of notability. If you can assert some notability, you can probably recreate it; if someone wants to delete it then, they'll need to have a proper articles for deletion debate, instead of the last brief one. If you have something to indicate notability (note our policy on verifiability of information), then I can restore the article for you to add it. No guarantees that a decision will not be reached to delete it again though. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Monkeybreath (and different spellings)

The only thing I reported him was for a 3RR vio and he's been having a grudge against me, heh... I guess I should be happy that my user page is getting vandalized? Thanks for that rv, btw. :) -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 09:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scot Sherman

Seriously. You instigated its deletion, and I would really really really like to see what it was all about. I heard that it was 40k. It must have been cool. Even if you can't find/don't know about a cached version, any memories you have about it would be awesome. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.53.46.141 (talk) 23:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC).

Sorry for not responding immediately, I was recovering it. User:Consumed Crustacean/Scot Sherman. Please save the file locally so I can redelete it. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Cross posting"

My edit history is a active mess because I kept forgetting to use Preview. Most of those postings are minor edits to my prior text.

All I've done is provide my opposition once (left to see), plus comment once (left for all to see ) on a neutral editor's vote because it noted Jakew's heavy involvement in the Circumcision topic.TipPt 18:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Read WP:CANVAS. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Be careful removing trolling

I don't think this was trolling. The user reposted the question two days later and got an answer. See Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#black rights. -- SCZenz 19:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

IIRC (and I may not), we had a series of related questions asked on/around that day, many of which were obvious trolling, and all of which were written with a somewhat similar style. It was probably a bad call though, I'll be more careful. Thanks. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 19:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AIV removal by non admin

Hi, you just removed a user from AIV that had not received a final warning. I saw that this should not have been added and explained to the user that added it about final warnings and stuff. For future references, as a non admin, if it is obvious that the proposed vandal should not be blocked, am I OK to remove the name? Regards RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 22:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure. According to WP:ADMIN, "Any user can behave in a way befitting an administrator (provided they do not falsely claim to be one), even if they have not been given the extra administrative functions". If it's uncertain you might want to err on the side of caution and wait for someone else to do it, but otherwise it should be fine. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Cheers, I just see it quite a lot on AIV and wasn't sure if removal of a user would get me a slap on the wrists! Obviously, I'll err on the side of caution if theres any doubt that the user should be removed. Thanks again RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] My talk page

Mr. Crustacean, I had actualy decided not to bother arguing anything on my talk page. Thank you for restoring it, however, I have been informed, by admins, that if I choose not to backup my discussion page I can do so. Finding out that all the negative statements of late have been started by MSJapan's complaints I have nothing to say apart from what I have written at the administrator's complaint board. Thanks again for your lucid comments. Dwain 00:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I had no idea what you were doing with the page. You blanked it, unblanked it, added extra spacing to it using an odd edit summary, reblanked it, and so on. I wasn't certain what state you intended it to be in, and indeed you didn't provide edit summaries to explain that. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Consumed Crustacean. I partially reverted your edit on Dwain's talk page. That is, I reverted your revert of his removal of unwanted posts, but I left your new post. It's not intended as a snub to you, but I feel very strongly that since removal of other people's edits from one's own talk page, while discouraged, is not forbidden, a user who does so should not be reverted. It only causes unnecessary anger, and doesn't achieve any good sufficient to counterbalance that. And that's something that I feel even with the worst trolls. If someone inserts naughty words into the article about President Bush, then revert him, even if you're going to make him angry. But if someone removes unwanted comments from his own talk page — well, it's not damaging the encyclopaedia, is it? (I agree that the blanking and unblanking, etc., with no edit summaries, made things confusing!) Cheers. Musical Linguist 00:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with one being aloud to remove talk page comments. I just had no idea what state he intended it to be in, as I said. Due to the confusing nature of it, I wasn't certain if it was intentional or not, and after a couple of edit conflicts I just said "screw it" and posted it as well as everything else. Hasty, yes. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome vandal?

Hi Consumed Crustacean. What does Seong0980 (talk • contribs) have to do with the welcome vandal? I've indented him in the list and left a comment. Did you copy&paste the wrong username, or am I missing something? Note also that Jpgordon has carried out the checkuser. Picaroon 03:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Nothing, it was an incorrect copy/paste. I meant to add BNW11. Whoops :/ -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 03:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Vandal

I really don't mind, I was going to do indef, but I thought that was a little too harsh, but you can lengthen it to indef if you wish. Cbrown1023 04:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tiny Kong

Thank you for moving back the page. Some of them link to this page with these keywords. --PJ Pete

Sure, no problem. You should thank Dancter and HeroicJay; I only did it because I noticed the speedy deletion tag they put on it. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Could you check this?

I posted that welcome vandal thing yesterday and you checked it out. I had prod'd one article in a new state and warned a vandal, and now they're going off on my talk page at each other being abusive. User:Honeydip69 and User:Connman21. Not sure what I should do, Honey is the vandal. - Denny 03:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed response, I've had homework. Honey is, err... I sent him a test4, since it's pretty clear that he's being intentionally disruptive. It'll probably be an indefinite block if he keeps it up, considering his lack of useful contributions. The other fellow just seems like a frustrated newbie; I think you handled it decently, hopefully it will chill out. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Assistance required.

Hello Sir I am having a problem with User:DennyColt. This is an exert of a message I recently sent him asking for evidence of my alleged vandalism.

  • Excuse me Denny what do you mean when you said "it looked like a completely raw thing that wasn't right to be an article??" It is a real article. The synopsis I added is completely accurate, and before any deletion I would like proof of any wrongdoings.

I wrote that article to the best of my ability and I assure you that should you want to research the information you will be satisfied with what I wrote. Thank you.

I'm not particularly sure what he meant by that, though I think he might have hit the prod a bit early. The article is completely unsourced though, which is something which should probably be corrected (see Wikipedia:Verifiability, a major policy), and an overly lengthy synopsis from a single TV episode might not be encyclopedic. I'm guessing this is along the lines of his thinking. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

How exactly would I cite a tv show? The only way I could provide a source would be to include the name of the episode. I couldn't use a website or supporting article to cite could I? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.118.190.148 (talk • contribs).

A website would be probably be fine in a case like this, so long as it's decent, though a reliable one would be preferable. Again, Wikipedia:Verifiability is pertinent; everything in the Wikipedia, besides possibly extremely short stubs, should cite some source. In the case of the transformers articles, they have a lot of information (synopsis, trivia, and animation mistake sections in many of them), but no references in sight. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Well after I spent all that time writing it I would be very upset and angry if it was deleted because Denny made a judgement call on something he may or may not know anything about. Thanks for your help.

[edit] hey

hey buddy, fuck off that stuff about ronaldo was completely accuracte. prove me otherwise cunt —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Honeydip69 (talk • contribs).

Bye bye now. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanx

YOU R THE BEST. Hope you stay in Wikipedia forever.Pendo 4 03:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Repeat Vandal User:24.181.122.190 Assistance

Hello, this IP was blocked for one day. The editor resumed vandalism as soon as the block was lifted. Can you please extend the block on this IP? -thanks- STS01 18:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Done, went for 2 weeks as it appears to be a static or somewhat static IP. Thanks for the notice. WP:AIV would probably have been faster if I wasn't online right now ;) -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sylvia Browne

Hi, with regard to your citation request in this article, clearly no one citation will cover all those radio shows, and it is not really practical to create a list of 6 citations, one after the other. Perhaps you could clarify what you're after here? Thanks a lot, and regards — BillC talk 01:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it's impractical to list 6 citations at all, especially when 6 claims that need sourcing are included. Any amount would be better than the current zero. Wikipedia:Verifiability is pretty crucial, and it gives readers increased confidence in the article, as well as further places to explore the topic. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Impractical to look like this.[1][2][3][4][5][6] However, I can certainly find refs for at least some of them. — BillC talk 01:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Could just be put directly after the reference to the station: "... featured on some station[1], some other station[2], and yet another[3]." -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Second opinion

Hi, I posted a complain on the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Donteatyellowsnow. One administrator has replied so far. I'm relatively new to the concept of WP:ANI, but I feel that considering the user was blocked once, and the number of warnings and incidents with that user, that the reaction was relatively light. Would you be able to give a second opinion, even if it supports the response. Thank again in advance. =) Langara College 05:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the slow response. I'm out of the Wikipedia mood right now, and I don't think I can help at the moment. My apologies. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

Forgot my signature, thanks for marking it -- febtalk 05:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Signing

Please be sure to sign talk pages and other discussion pages with ~~~~. This includes warning users with warning templates and the like. Thanks, and happy editing. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, thanks for the reminder. Did that a couple of times tonight, completely slipped my mind. Also, thank you for your quick action to my vandalism complaint! Nemilar 10:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CSS

I saw you answer a CSS question on the help desk. Is there a list of classes I can reference somewhere? --Mgm|(talk) 23:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Catalogue of CSS classes. You can also just look at the page's source code and read off the class or ID attribute, as in <div class="usermessage">. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 03:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Many thanks for the assistance

I'd just like to say thank you for answering my question about the new message box's CSS code on the help desk. I knew I had seen something about it mentioned before, I just couldn't recall where. I hope you have a most wonderful day, and happy editing! Kyra~(talk) 01:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Thanks

For restoring Pierre Joliot. Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 22:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism?

It wasn't vandalism, I reverted a guy who replaced Mario with Michael Jackson! Bly1993 22:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

You edit is here [3]. I can't see any "Michael Jackson" edits within an hour. If that's what you intended, I have no idea what happened. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
It was there, but for some reason it didn't show up in the history. I have no idea. But I swear it was there. That happened once on the Twilight Princess page too. Bly1993 23:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Then it was probably vandalism to a template on the page. If you're going to revert, make sure you actually check the diff of what you're reverting, or click the "Show Changes" button at the bottom. I could be a database hiccup, but those are pretty rare. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 03:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page, I would have done it myself, but I was blocking the user indefinitely. :) That wasn't the first time he done that, and I had just reverted/warned him (which is how he got my username). Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah, cool. No problem. Just middle-click-rollback'd the rest of his "contributions". -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] help desk / hookah

No problem. I figured that section got added while you were reverting and just got removed by accident. *Mishatx*-In\Out 05:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Indefinitely blocked user

Could you show me where this 'general consensus' is? They're being deleted per DENY; there is absolutely no consensus that people can go around deleting stuff per essays. Pages can still be put through MfD, and I'd expect that they'd get deleted there. However, DENY is not policy. 1ne 06:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Do I have to grab a specific page? It's a general thing. It's been going on for awhile, and I'm unaware of any serious challenges to it. I certainly don't think it's worth wheeling over and reverting deletions that have already taken place. Besides that, that particular user's page falls under WP:CSD G5. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Just because many people support an essay doesn't mean it's a 'general thing' that can be accepted. I certainly think that if it has such widespread support, it should be made a guideline or policy. As I've stated before elsewhere, I have no problem with the content of the 'DENY' essay. My problem is that it's an essay. 1ne 16:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Also, did the imposter add the 'indefblocked' template to the page himself? If he didn't, then it does not fall under G5. 1ne 16:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Does it matter? Is there a historical reason to keep the page? If you want me to pull another CSD out of my hat, G6; non-controversial housekeeping. Keeping imposter's userpages lying around doesn't help anyone, or really help the encyclopedia in any manner. I could also pull out WP:IAR, which is policy, though I hate to do that. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Hi, could you do anything about this user: User_talk:Googoola? The account seems to be used mainly for vandalism. Thanks. Kon-Tiki001 15:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I've indefinitely blocked him. There doesn't seem to be a single useful contribution. Thanks for noticing it. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] suggestions

i suggest you take care of the rude people in wikipedia like "Lanicoya" that are rude and racist nad if you haven't noticed she has been attacking me she insulted me first and i am offended why dont you do something about that?!Bacanaleranica 03:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/190.53.15.171 looks valid. Throwing around claims of racism is incivil. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 04:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Timberlake07.jpg

In the future, make sure to a image with disputed licensing with Template:PUIdisputed and notify the uploader as well. —Iamunknown 06:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ack, will do. Thanks for spotting it. I was rushing on that last edit last night, I suppose I got sloppy. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Martin's 3RR

You beat me to it, I just went there to report it. Thanks. --Milo H Minderbinder 22:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

And thank you for replacing the sample. I was wondering if I was just looking for it in the wrong place. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Looking at the edit history of User:Myriam Tobias, I get the suspicion it may be a sock puppet of User:Martinphi, particularly since the new account has only edited articles Martin has also been editing in the same period. I'd appreciate your opinion, do you think I should make a SOCK report or request a checkuser? Thanks. --Milo H Minderbinder 23:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I'll take a look later, but my first impression wasn't so. I'll be somewhat busy this weekend, so it might take time to reply -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
To follow up, I ended up filing Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Martinphi. Seems pretty blatant to me, but I'll see what other editors think. --Milo H Minderbinder 15:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Interesting how the report progressed. The meatpuppetry would explain why I didn't read the two users as being the same person. Good call. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 15:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything I need to do to follow up on it? I haven't done one of those before so I'm not sure how it works - will an admin just close it at some point and decide if action is necessary then? --Minderbinder 15:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Often, yes. It's only been open a couple days, and it already has comments from a few different users. If it simply dies out though, a mention on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Community noticeboard might help. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] EXPLANAITON FOR GNOMING

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Wikignome

read it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smith Jones (talk • contribs).

[edit] For keeping the Matthew Books page

Argument for keeping the Matthew Books page. There have been over 10,000 copies of these books sold, and they have received numerous reviews on Amazon.com. If this article is to be removed because the books are "not popular" then all but two articles about (spiritual) mediums should be removed as well.

Also, I am working on cleaning up the page.

If this article is to be removed doe to lack of notability, then the following should be as well:

Channelled entities: Aiwass, Count of St Germain, Djwal Khul, Dr. Fritz, Kryon

Spiritual mediums: Derek Acorah, Ailene Light, Rosemary Altea, Mina Crandon Benjamin Creme, Allison DuBois, Eva Pierrakos, Arthur Ford, Colin Fry, Ronna, Herman, Esther Hicks, Gordon Higginson, Estelle Roberts, Jane Roberts, Betty Shine, Doris Stokes, Swami Laura Horos, James Van Praagh, Lisa Williams, Mary Ann Wintkowski, Patience Worth, and Chico Xavier

--Snooziums 22:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

In addition, there is a review of the books and interview with their author on the Meria Heller show, a well-known radio show in the links section.

--Snooziums 22:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Attribution -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 22:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Can you do something about this?

Hello.
You're the first admin I could think of to deal with a trouble-editor. For a while, they were causing problems by making accusations, implied threats, insulting, etc... but they eventually stopped-when they "retired".
However, it seems like they've come out of retirement just to gripe. That, in and of itself, is fine (Heck, I like griping too), but I don't think it's appropriate to call people "dooshbag"(his spelling, not mine), or "retard" in edit summaries, as in here and here. The first was in response to someone basically saying they never got to resolve their issues with him. The second was in response to my saying it's inexcusable to call someone a douchebag (which apparently makes me a 'retard'). If this is what he came out of 'retirement' for, what's the bloody point? Bladestorm 14:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah. Another admin's already taken care of it. Bladestorm 16:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Good stuff then. I've been somewhat inactive as of late, and I don't know how long that will last. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 15:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

Thanks for fixing the merge at Lunisolar calendar. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 19:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Billy Ego reported by User:MarkThomas

Hi, I wonder if you could spare a minute to review my recent 3RR complaint on User:Billy Ego for his repeated revert behaviour on Nazism at 3RR report on Billy Ego? Thanks! MarkThomas 17:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I see exactly three reverts, not four. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 70.153.116.145

That's probably not going to stop him for more than a couple of minutes. He's been IP socking for over an hour. HalfShadow 21:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Just noticed. Hrm. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I blame society. That way it's everyone's fault. HalfShadow 21:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] user: kpy18

user kpy18 should not have been blocked its complete bullshit its like if i was playing crackdown and i touched myself till i peed it just doesnt happen. Now im lookin at some page that has fucking clowns on it what the hell. Well anyways its for a school project so you banned him for no fucking reason whatsoever you sir are a moron and deserve whats comin to you which i hope is a bullet. If you wont unblock him then you have to block me! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumed_Crustacean_is_a_faggot there thats for you! I made it just for you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).

You're referring to User:KPY1. He was acting disruptive, and refused to stop or even to express desire to stop. He also issued a death threat. If he contests the block with the {{unblock}} tag as described on the block message, and does so reasonably, I or someone else might unblock him. However, if your school project is to mess with the Wikipedia, it sounds like I have no choice but to keep the block on. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


obviously your a fucking moron for taking a death threat over the internet in any way serious thats really sad also his name is kpy18 not kpy1 shows how much thought u put into your words or maybe even actions. Lastly what the fuck you called it the wikipedia its just wikipedia not "the" that makes it sound retarded and the threat he said was jokingly we should kill this guy you think hes gonna follow through with that? Also were adding to our own fucking schools wikipedia for school were messing around with that and will keep any messing around within that. Please dont be a fucking moron oh and by the way if you really take a death threat serious over the internet well then i think you deservere to be killed :) thanks and have a nice day! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).

Oh no, I mistyped a username, whatever will I do? You don't own your school's article. Disruptions to the article aren't permitted simply because you attend the school. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 15:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

hey how is it refusal to stop if he said its for a school project you just never asked nicely and wow you are a fucking moron nice job! o btw where is kettle moraine school at i dont know where it is can you give me directions from texas?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).

I already said he can appeal it. He was asked to stop, he responded by saying it's for a school project, which indicates that he had no intent to stop. You yourself should probably stop adding things about staff members hunting T-Rexs and other nonsense. And Google Maps. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

wow i never added ne thing to that webpage i did revert it but reverted it back right away i never added ne of that stuff so obviously you have no idea whos doing anything so how can you have the right to ban someone if you cant even figure out who edited what?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hckydude1103 (talk • contribs).

You readded it, and soon after removed it. That's still disruptive, and I didn't see your revert until after I sent the warning. Please chill. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Association of Members' Advocates MFD

Gosh, never thought my post would end in an MFD but OTOH I'm a big fan of bold actions and AN consensus seems clear, so good on ya :)

Anyway, I was just wondering if subpages ought to be included. Stuff like Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/AMA Coordinator and {{AMA alerts}} --kingboyk 16:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I just put a note to that effect at the top. Thanks :) -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Why!!???? why??? what's on with you man? why a mfd on AMA, why?? --Emperor Walter Humala · ( talk? · help! ) 20:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Have you read the MfD and the discussions surrounding it? Please, no knee-jerk reactions. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 20:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/o/n/User_talk%7EConsumed_Crustacean_e411.html"