Template talk:ConfirmationOTRS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Using this template on images may be misleading, see e.g. Image:12AE10CompactronTube.jpg, where the author has released the image into the public domain. He has not stated that he'd license it under the GFDL, he has explicitly said "public domain". Since this tag is used on that image page, there are now two different and slightly conflicting licensing claims there. I would suggest that for images, a second template be used where one could explicitly specify to what license the photographer agreed. Lupo 19:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Perhaps this template should simply changed accordingly (commons does it this way, too). -- mkrohn 00:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)