Talk:Controversial literature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Last one was Better

No offense but this version of the Controversial literature article is just awful and I have to question the writers refrense. Tony360X's version of Controversial literature article was much better and more useful. All this guy did was got a good thing deleted just so he can put unessary crap as a replacment. - BigFrank100

For anyone considering taking the above opinion seriously, see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X and Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X. pbryan 19:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC) See also [1]. pbryan 18:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok seriously, no offense, but your fucking doush with nothing better to do or contribut. All you seem to do is harras me and Tony360X cause your probly boning the new guy who wrote this page. So do something for useful or shut the hell up you fucking wine-o. – BingFrank100

Wikipedia is not the place for Bill Hicks-esque outbursts. Artiste-extraordinaire 02:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm just pointing out an observasion I see in pbryan - BingFrank100

I think the current version is much better.--Bryson 01:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)