Talk:Conspiracy of Calaspia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
Tasks you can do:
|
|||
[edit] Reviews
I think the Reviews section is a bit much. It's bordering on POV, especially since there is barely any other information about the book in the article (its plot, characters, ect. standard things to discuss aside from every positive review under the sun). Also, has there been no negative criticism at all? Surely, not every single review has said only positive things. Wikipedia is neutral. It goes against the concept of a neutral encyclopedia to present only one side of the subject. Also, review quotes should be limited in scope to the book, not including general statements regarding the Guptara twins. In the same line of thought, there should be citations for every quote in the reviews section. It's not enough to say who said it or where it was said. Leebo86 21:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
