Talk:Conspiracy Theory (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.

(Movie) should not be capitalized. --dan

moved. --mav

---

(William M. Connolley 16:08, 2004 Mar 11 (UTC)) This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, but isnt it a poor idea to distonguish a film and an idea by capitalisation? The movie ought to be Conspiracy theory (movie).

---

However, his rant about fluoride in the water has, over the years, been increasingly echoed by doctors and scientists as a health risk, particularly to children.

The sitation following this statement is a pretty poor one. If there's any evidence that the above is the case, e.g. a survey from a scientific periodical, it should be linked to; otherwise the statement and current link should be removed.

[edit] Controversy?

Why is the opening contraversial? as it is most of that information looks more suited to the trivia segment. 81.152.196.46 13:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

• I was just wondering why conspiracy theory goes straight to here. Isn't the topic that the movie is based on more relevant than the movie? If I knew how to make it the lead article I would.

I agree, but I also don't know how to make the idea the primary redirect. --Lexein 10:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Synopsis

• Lack of Synopsis section will keep this article from getting to Good Article status. I don't have a copy of the film. Remember, Wikipedia does include spoilers. Anyone? --Lexein 10:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)