Talk:Connexions agency

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Biased Article

This whole article seems a bit biased to me. I suspect it may have been written by someone who would like to show Connexions in a positive light. In particular the line stating 'As a result they are a shining example, in theory as well as in practice, of joined up government at the level of delivery.'. I work for Connexions and myself, my colleauges and other agencies wouldn't agree with this line at all. Besides you can't prove that this is the case. If I can find an article backing me up I indend to change the entry. --Adam281 15:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

True. Plus they're massive pests. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.252.240.14 (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

They make me very paranoid. I don't trust the Cambridge branch one little bit, even less when they're pandering to people like me in their late teens. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.66.205.157 (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Adam281, I concur with your observations relating to the sentence you provided. It seems that the article has since been cleaned up -- feel free to raise any additional concerns that you may have. To the two anonymous editors whom forgot to sign, thank you for your utterly useless comments. Cheers --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 23:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)