Talk:Conlon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On 21 Jan 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Conlon for a record of the discussion. Rossami (talk) 02:14, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page has been m:Transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that may be useful at WP's sister project, Wiktionary (http://en.wiktionary.org). Therefore the article can be found at either Wiktionary:Transwiki:Conlon or Wiktionary:Conlon Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be approprate for the Wiktionary. The final disposition of the article on Wikipedia has not yet been determined. It may be redirected, it may go to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion, or it may evolve beyond a dictionary definition and remain on the Wikipedia. If none of these tasks have been performed, please do so.

This article has subsequently been turned into a disambiguation page. This resolves the disposition of the Wikipedia version article.

In a separate matter, I note that most of the names shown on this disambiguation page are currently redlinks with very few inbound links. In three cases, there were no inbound links except from this disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages are not really the appropriate place to enter the request for an article on that topic. I am removing the redlinked lines from the page. Please do not add them back until and unless a verifiable, non-stub article is created on this person. You can periodically check this version of the history to see if a redlink is now a bluelink. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 5 July 2005 23:11 (UTC)

Every one of those redlinks is a person mentioned in an existing Wikipedia article. It seems to me most unlikely that the creator of the redlinked articles will think to update this list. I do not understand the harm done by having them as redlinks until they are populated. —Theo (Talk) 6 July 2005 09:25 (UTC)

Answered at length on your Talk page. Apologies for the very long post. Rossami (talk) 6 July 2005 15:36 (UTC)