User talk:Computerjoe/Archive 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Timestamped
Untimestamped
Hmm
Which pages did I blank? 80.41.210.169 18:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Odd... I didn't blank it. Damn my screwy computer. 80.41.210.169 18:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Approval
When will the approval sys. for VandalProof be online? 70.108.65.236 17:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Computerjoe's talk 19:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- I mean when will the vandal proof uses be approved? 70.108.65.236 20:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- In order to be approved you need an account, and to add yourself to the awaiting approval list. Computerjoe's talk 21:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I forgot to login. The Fox Man of Fire 00:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- In order to be approved you need an account, and to add yourself to the awaiting approval list. Computerjoe's talk 21:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- I mean when will the vandal proof uses be approved? 70.108.65.236 20:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Vandal Proof help
Recent changes is not ever updating... The Fox Man of Fire 12:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, still nothing.The Fox Man of Fire 12:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Deletion review
I believe that you may want to comment on Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 3. Nikola 03:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 2nd.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 40 | 2 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| New speedy deletion criteria added | News and notes |
| Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Portal:Blog
You added the link to the portal mentioned above on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Blogging. This is to advise you that the portal itself is currently being considered for deletion. Please feel free to follow the links to take part in the discussion. Thank you. Badbilltucker 16:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
More VP errors
Even though I click update on VP, nothing ever happens. The Fox Man of Fire 18:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 9th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 41 | 9 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Cafasso image
Despite your reply in the talk of Joseph Cafasso that user:Evrik has anyway used some of the images, uploaiding on Commons as a generic {{PD}}. He is also starting somewhat an edit war with Ian Spackman who is deleting that image, and has given no argumentation for the use of the doubtful (and also bad quality) image. Maybe you can intervene and discourage Evrik from his aggressivity. Bye and good work. --Attilios 14:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- I've commented over on Commons. Computerjoe's talk 15:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 16th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 42 | 16 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding Association of Members' Advocates
Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! Martinp23 20:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 23rd.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 43 | 23 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| Report from the Finnish Wikipedia | News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones |
| Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
WP:UW
Hi Computerjoe,
I see looking at the WikiProject user warnings page, that you are a participant in this project. I have recently started an undertaking to harmonise all user page warnings and templates. For this I would like your assistance. I have listed a number of ideas on the project template page here as a first draft. I fully appreciate that as with most editors and admins, that you are fairly busy. Therefore I am not looking for anyone to carry out the actual work, I am willing to do that myself, with help from a number of other RC Patrollers who have come forward. But what I am looking for is your invaluable input, on the draft ideas and also to suggest other ways you believe we may improve the templates. I do however require the services of a couple of administrators to put into effect some of the new templates, as they are currently protected. Please take 5 mins to look through the new templates page, and both the project and templates talk pages and leave any ideas or suggestions that you may have. Best regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 09:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Today's featured article
Just wanted to let you know a featured article you worked on, 0.999..., was featured today on the Main Page. Tobacman 00:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
editorial opinion?
Can you take a look at the article Front side bus and give me some feedback? I chopped out a bunch of material. Please let me know what you think. (And does that box at the top right look useful to you?) RJFJR 11:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 30th.
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Taskforce, does it look done?
One final check of Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Software prototyping, please. I think it's about ready to close, but I may be too close to the article now. Thank you. RJFJR 17:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
Cleanup Taskforce
Are you interested in being assigned another computer related article? RJFJR 17:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 6th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Your Tariq co-nom
is completely useless, it does not add anything. I am afraid he will be worse off for it. Consider removing it, seriously. - crz crztalk 17:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm.. sounds kinda strident, doesn't it? Apologies. Was rushed. - crz crztalk 18:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 13th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Turnovsky-Martin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Turnovsky-Martin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 22:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Concordia up for MfD
Hi there. As you are the founder of Concordia, I thought that I would make you aware that someone has nominated your organisation for deletion. You can find the discussion here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Concordia. Regards. --tgheretford (talk) 21:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 20th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hewitt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hewitt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe 19:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I added a new version of that photo of Patricia Hewitt so it would be good enough quality for the Infoboxpolitician template (but still lower quality than the original so I think fair use is satisfied) as such I think the old one is redundant. What do you think? Thanks. WJBscribe 03:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- I saw LOL. This can be deleted. Computerjoe's talk 16:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 27th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
MedCabal
Hi, we have a heavy backload of cases at WP:MEDCAB and since you are on the mediator list I thought I would request your help. Thanks! --Ideogram 10:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Very nice work
Just wanted to say that this is very nice. shotwell 01:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Please reconsider your vote re SE Wikiquote
Please reconsider your vote re Simple English Wikiquote. Your comment with your vote suggests you don't understand what SE Wikiquote is for. It is not about collecting quotes in Simple English. See my user page, for example, for a discussion of the aim of SE Wikiquote. The vote is at meta:Proposals for closing projects Thanks. --Coppertwig 03:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup Taskforce
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/CVSS and comment on the state of CVSS. I did a rewrite to clear CV. Now it needs wikilinks and I need some feedback on what further work it needs. Thank you. RJFJR 02:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 4th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
User:Cicero Dog
This user account is blocked indefinitely. The user pages of such users are eventually deleted, as they are a maintenance hassle and show up in Web search results as dirty laundry. —Centrx→talk • 21:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for voting
Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Concordia
You are officially still a councilor. I am considering boosting the organization back up again, so could you please let me know if you would be active and prepared to assume this role. Thanks! Ian¹³/t 22:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 11th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 50 | 11 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Concordia Newsletter
NEWSLETTER
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
Help out now!
- Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
- Give people the Civility Barnstar.
- Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
- Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
- Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
Decision Making
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.
This AMA Case
I'm just letting you know that I have closed this case, as the advocee hasn't been on Wikipedia since Nov. 7. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:UW
Hi,
You have put yourself as interested in helping out atWikiProject on user warnings. We are now at a stage where we are creating the new templates and are wondering if you are still interested? If so please visit the overview page and choose a warning type you wish to work on. There is a base template available here, which you can copy and use to get you started. Have a look through the redirects and see what old templates are affected and incorporate them into the the new system. Anyway, any questions please don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 08:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 18th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 51 | 18 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Opinion?
What do you think of List of Fibre Channel switch vendors ( which links to List of Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters)? My first reaction is to prod it. But the second article looks a little more reasonable. What do you think, please? RJFJR 17:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I would suggest you PROD them both as listcruft. Computerjoe's talk 19:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- prodded. Thank you. RJFJR 22:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Please!!!
Did you make the name of Jimbo Wales in Klingon? If you don't mind, can you make me one for my page: User:Leor Natanov/In many languages? Please and thanks!!! Leor Natanov 02:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank You so MUCH!!!!! Leor Natanov 03:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Inconsistencies
Hi computerjoe, can I ask why you called for an afd over Inconsistencies in the Star Trek canon? many thanks! Magic Pickle 20:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey. I specified my reasons in the AfD. Computerjoe's talk 20:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
If a subject is notable, then a detailed analysis of it is also. Magic Pickle 20:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC) We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. What constitutes 'indiscrimate information' is surely a matter of POV. Magic Pickle 21:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Being in the minority doesn't mean you are wrong. Magic Pickle 21:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Concordia
Since you are in favor of complete abolition of Concordia[1], I think your efforts are a conflict of interest to reviving/developing Concordia. I really think you should recuse yourself. You talk about expelling members, but when I suggest a criteria for such expulsion, you say it's too beaurocratic. --ElectricEye (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I take that back Computerjoe, that was uncivil of me to say so. I'm sorry for not assuming good faith. --ElectricEye (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
More inconsistency pages
Hi Cj, just found Inconsistencies in Gilmore Girls, would you support me in calling for AFD? thanks. Magic Pickle 19:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that, CJ. You may also like to take a look at List of continuity errors and anachronisms in M*A*S*H and consider deletion. Thanks. Magic Pickle 23:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
OK: next one for possible delete: - UNIT dating controversy. Thanks. Magic Pickle 01:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
WIKIPEDIA
Hello Joe, it's been a while, old boy. You may remember me - i have a different user name now of course. I feel that wikipedia is being mislead and would like your help in taking it over. Odysius Wolf 18:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Template:Civil2 proposed for deletion
I noticed that you have previously worked on Template:Civil2. I thought you should know that it is currently proposed for deletion. Please consider adding your comments at templates for deletion. -- Aylahs (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 2 | 8 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Your request for a case
Hi - based on your request here, I'm going to try to allocate you a case :) there were only two to choose from, so by blind tab clicking (and other factors :P) can I suggest Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/Sethie? It seems like quite a deep running dispute, and is heading towards mediation (formal), from advocacy of the other party. It might be good to try to avert mediation if you can, but in any case it should help to be able to talk with Geo.plrd (the other advocate) about the case, who I'm sure will be eager to bring it to an amicable resolution. Let me know if this is OK - Martinp23 17:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I of course am interested in an amicable resolution. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Geo. 20:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not upload still images in the GIF format
Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you've uploaded Image:RedcarClevelandLogo.gif in the GIF format. In the future, please save still GIF images in the PNG format before uploading (see Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload). PNG images almost always have a smaller file size, which decreases the amount of time they take to load. There are a bunch of other advantages to the PNG format such as lossless compression that you can read about on its Wikipedia article. —Remember the dot (t) 22:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
AMA Case
Hi - I have no idea about the background to the dispute, so I wouldn't be able to take it over completely, but by all means I'll be happy to co-advocate with you. What's the current status of the dispute, and your reason for seeking help? This should help me to get a sense of the debate :) Thanks, Martinp23 11:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
| News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
| Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks and..
I very, very, very much appreciate your attempts to negotiate something between me and TG in terms of where to take this conflict. For that I thank yo much.
And, I no longer feel the pull for your counsel. I am disapointed that you would look at my response and only see uncivility after TimidGuy slipped in such zingers as: "I don't see how we can ever deal with the disputed sources in the article if Sethie intends to change the focus of every RfC into a personal issue."
Would you be willing to read that again? "I don't see how we can ever deal with the disputed sources in the article if Sethie intends to change the focus of every RfC into a personal issue." It's ridiculous!
And "But I just don't see the pont, since Sethie would likely turn it into a personal issue."
Here is a guy, talking about me 3rd person, on my AMA page, making accusations about my future behavior, and innacurate descriptions of my current behavior (my RfC comments on the TM page).
Your response to this was to rebuke me for incivility for calling him on exagerations, ignore his incivility/innacuracy and then on my AMA page, give me a slap on the wrist for my userpage?
That's not what I was hoping for in an advocate!
As for my userpage, we can talk about that on my talk page.Sethie 19:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Even if a user is uncivil to you you must not be uncivil to them. Also, as for your userpage I thought it was my responsibility as a Wikipedian to remove them. If you took the names out from the comments, it would be fine. Computerjoe's talk 19:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for trying
HI, Computerjoe. Thanks so much for your efforts to deal with the dispute between Sethie and me. I can't quite understand why volunteers like yourself would be motivated to get involved in such messes, and I appreciate the generosity of you and others. : ) I'm sorry for my waffling regarding your suggestions on how to proceed and regarding an informal solution. Each time things settled down in the dispute, I thought maybe it would be OK.
I'm sorry to see that your advocee complained and that it's led to opening an investigation. Let me know if you need my support in any way. I value your sincere attempt, and I want to state again that just initiating the process and broaching an open discussion on the Advocate pages has seemed to help the situation. I'm confident that whatever further steps are taken will also help. As I understand, Sethie still has the assistance of Gary and Martin. TimidGuy 18:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
AMA investigation
Hi Computerjoe, I'm Wikiwoohoo, one of the deputy co-ordinators.
It has been brought to my attention that there have been problems and accusations of improper conduct that have arisen within the case of Sethie and TimidGuy.
What I'd like to do is find out all the facts behind this case and solve this problem as soon as possible. Would it be possible for you to provide me with a full statement of your version of events and once I have gathered the same from the two other users in question, I will be able to investigate fully.
I appreciate you may be busy outside Wikipedia so any reply in your own time will be very much appreciated, either on my talk page or if you prefer, my email address: shown on my user page. Many thanks for your time; I hope to be able to solve this problem as soon as I can. Wikiwoohoo 19:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I voluteeered to co-advocate this case, and almost immediately concerns were raised over whether I was acting as mediator or advocate. I said I was acting as an advocate trying to find a mutually beneficial solution.
- While I was acting as advocate, everything seemed to calm down. However, my advocee was uncivil on multiple occasions - which I warned him about - and I also removed something I saw as a personal attack from his user page. [2].
- Sethie complained I was only seeing his incivility, not the other party's.
- I referred it to investigation as I felt I might have acted inappropiately as an advocate. Thanks, Computerjoe's talk 19:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing me with your statement on this matter. I have now received other statements from the two other users involved and will provide my report within the next few days. I will provide you with a link to it once it is active. Wikiwoohoo 16:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Many thanks for your co-operation in my investigation. My report into the matter can now be found here: Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/Sethie#Investigation.
I hope this concludes the dispute that had been ongoing. Wikiwoohoo 16:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Roadcruft
Well, I guess I finally nailed my colors to the mast -> Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania Route 999. Did I go too far? Or not far enough? Edeans 03:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
WinLIKE
An editor has asked for a deletion review of WinLIKE. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 84.185.211.19 14:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
This is a automated to all bot operators
Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
WinLIKE
You nominated the article WinLIKE for deletion and the AfD consensus was to delete. However, an appeal has been made at deletion review to restore the article. The main argument is that sources which assert notability have now been provided. You may wish to comment here: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 12#WinLIKE. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Automated message to bot owners
As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy:
Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds.
Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 00:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of unassessed articles tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 20:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
TechCrunch mediation
 |
Quick Links for MedCab Case: Cases/TechCrunch | |
| Talk:TechCrunch |
There is now an active WP:Mediation Cabal case to resolve whether or not the "criticisms" in the TechCruch article should or should not remain. As one of the editors participating in the matter, you are invited to help in the resolution. For more info please follow above links. Wikidemo 03:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
