Talk:Computing machinery and intelligence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Needs a section describing the influence

It would be nice to have links to examples of work in the field that build upon issues raised first in Turing's paper. Maybe a link to Terry Winograd would be a good start. JWSchmidt 15:26, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

I deleted:

His closing remark in the text was:
We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done.
At this time, semantic in linguistic was not a theme to be discussed. After this article, however, things change dramatically. It was the idea of cognition as computation that reanimates the science of semantic.

It was found confusing since August 2006. I don't really get it, and it seems a bit of a non sequitur. Perhaps the author means semantics became a popular topic in computational linguistics? Semantics doesn't mention Turing. Regardless, it's a bit obscure, and could use a reference. Kaicarver 11:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/o/m/Talk%7EComputing_machinery_and_intelligence_981d.html"