Talk:Commuter rail in North America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
The term "Commuter rail" seems to be primarly used in North America, and be different from short-distance train service elsewhere. I propose that this page be renamed to it (instead of having the term redirect to Regional rail) and the info moved.
If so, the following list of links should be directed to the proper article:
- Regional rail
- Commuter rail
- Commuter rail in North America --Jason McHuff 00:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. Dragons flight 00:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Any?
I eliminated a number of rail systems that were listed on this page because they were not commuter railroads, as follows:
- Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) [1] -- BART is a metro system
- Hiawatha Line -- this is a light rail line
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority -- operates a system comprising one metro line and three light rail lines
- Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) [2] -- operates a metro system
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) [3] Atlanta -- MARTA is a metro system
- Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH) [4] New York, New Jersey -- PATH is a metro system
- Port Authority Transit Corporation (PATCO) [5] Philadelphia -- PATCO is a metro system
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) [6] Washington DC -- WMATA runs the Washington Metro, which is, predictably, a metro system
Some systems have been left on the list that are better known for their metros (i.e., the MBTA) but they do operate commuter rail as wel.
--Jfruh 23:54, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Regional rail/commuter rail
Commuter rail redirects to the article Regional rail; since that article is more detailed and less geographically-specific, perhaps some sort of merging is in order?David Arthur 21:59, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
The regional rail article seems to be directed at systems and equipment we generally do not have in North America. For example, "Commonly they are based on diesel multiple units (DMUs), which are self-propelled, bidirectional, articulated passenger rail cars with diesel engines, electric generators and electric motors located below the passenger compartment (strictly speaking, these are diesel-electric multiple units, or DEMUs). In some areas with electrified rail, electric multiple units (EMUs) are used. Electric and diesel-powered multiple units are almost invariably equipped with control cabs at both ends, which is why such units are so frequently used to provide commuter services, due to the associated short turn-around time." Vaoverland 23:14, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Overgeneralizing about 'Northeast' vs. rest of U.S.
"Passenger rail outside of the Northeast is infrequent and rarely used relative to networks in Europe and Japan." Not to quibble, but this common over-generalization ignores the huge commuter rail system in the Chicago area.
[edit] Split
Can we split the "under construction" and "proposed" tables? They're two very different things. bob rulz 17:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)