Talk:Community of practice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 March 2007. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
 |
This article is supported by the Sociology WikiProject, which gives a central approach to Sociology and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Community of practice, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Community WikiProject, which gives a central approach to Community and related subjects on Wikipedia. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
This article is of key interest to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Community.
sfx--145.254.157.15 21:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC) why do you think it is necessary to split this term of COPs up into different ones? Following the criteria for communities of practice they - undertake a common enterprise out of a shared interest (or maybe just an interest in solving an issue for themselves) - share tools and develop them further - participate in a shared practice (thus they also become active for a cause)
[edit] Incoherence
I would suggest reverting to the pre-Stevenson_Perez edits, except that version of the article wasn't especially good, either. The topic does seem to have some notability, but I don't know where to begin to rewrite this thing. -- TedFrank 20:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
