Comparison of FTP servers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The table below compares basic characteristics of FTP Servers.
| Name | Managed by | Target Niche | OS | Features | License |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrossFTP Server | Crossworld | Medium traffic and secure environments (SSL/TLS) | Windows, Mac OS X, Linux/Unix variance | GUI Administration, TLS/SSL security, monitoring, logging, File/LDAP/Database backend | Apache License V2.0 |
| Fastream IQ Web/FTP Server | Fastream Technologies | Commercial application | Windows 2000, XP Home/Professional, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, Server 2003 and Vista | Web server included, TLS/SSL security control, Remote administration | Proprietary |
| FileZilla Server | Tim Kosse | Medium traffic, medium security, non-critical | Windows NT,2000,XP,2003 | Simple administration, TLS/SSL security control, Remote administration | GPL |
| Internet Information Services | Microsoft | Commercial applications | Windows NT, 2000, XP Professional, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, Server 2003 and future releases | Remote administration inside Active Directory | Proprietary |
| PureFTPd | Frank Denis | Production and secure environments | Linux, Solaris, HPUX, MacOS and FreeBSD, (Potentially Windows though unofficial) | TLS Encryption, Flexible authentication | BSD |
| Vsftpd | Chris Evans | High traffic, production and secure environments (couples well with ssh for sftp) | Linux/Unix variants | GPL | |
| zFTPServer | Nicklas Bergfeldt | Unspecified | Windows NT,2000,XP,2003 | Simple administration, TLS/SSL security control, Remote administration, virtual filesystems, Anti-Hammering, System Service | Proprietary (Freeware) |
