User talk:Cold Light

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Cold Light, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alexa rating

A low Alexa rating is good indication that barely anyone visits a website.

lots of issues | leave me a message 23:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

No that's an indication that many user don't use alexa-spyware. --217.84.44.94 15:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anarchopedia

Hi,

First, a minor technical point: Yours was the only signed keep comment -- because the other keep commenter failed to sign his remark, I am free to discount it. That is not, however, why I found a deletion consensus -- remember AfD is not a "vote" in the strict sense, anyway; closers are empowered to weigh arguments. In this case, those favoring retention were quite poor, sadly. Your own remark referenced only pages within Anarchopedia and Wikipedia as sources: such self-references are deprecated by WP:RS. A verifiable article simply must have independent sources. The arguments of your unsigned fellow keep commenter were even further off the mark. Anarchopedia cannot be given a "pass" on the five pillars of Wikipedia because it is novel, noble, or a kindred wiki. Such an argument is exactly the opposite of policy here at Wikipedia, and only served to weaken the case for retaining the article. Put as simply as I can, there were no relevant arguments given in support of keeping the article. I'm sorry, but the decision was "open-and-shut" from a policy point-of-view, given the nature of the discussion in the record.

The place to present a request for appeal of the AfD is Deletion Review. You are free to go there and state a case, but I feel my closure was on very solid ground. I'm sure it goes without saying that I have nothing personal at stake here (I just "call them as I see them", as the saying goes) and I wish you good luck. Best wishes, Xoloz 03:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Please explain

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchopedia >;

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page >;

versus wiki.


Thank You.

Hopiakuta 03:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Dear User:Cold_Light:

Please assist me w/ the comparison.

I do not want to presume the differences.

Hopiakuta 04:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


I, sincerely, want to know.

I had nothing to do w/ your deletion.

I feel that they delete far too much without negotiation.

Please??

Hopiakuta 15:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank You.

I've put more onto my page.

Hopiakuta 23:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] < http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:hopiakuta >.

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page >;

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:hopiakuta >.


Hopiakuta 17:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ??

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:Cold_Light >??

Hopiakuta 03:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Space Race

I apologize for the tone of my comments. However, now that I reread your addition, it was also somewhat POV ("exploitation", "so-called"), and such. It just didn't really belong in that article. --Golbez 01:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/o/l/User_talk%7ECold_Light_486e.html"