Template talk:Colombia conflict
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Pastrana's Conception?
I've done a lit review for Plan Colombia and no where in the documentation is there any indication that the Plan was conceived by Pastrana's administration. In fact, it was only until after the package passed Congress was a Spanish translation made.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.112.181.253 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Visionary Party?
Maybe it's just me, but I don't really see how that Party, which was a fleeting (and failed, because now that the Congressional elections are over it doesn't exist) vehicle for Antanas Mockus could be considered an important party in the context of the Colombian conflict. Mockus might try to re-launch it at some point in the future, but right now it only exists in his head. Juancarlos2004 21:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] EPL
Should the EPL be moved into "Former groups?" It pretty much no longer exists as a guerrilla army. --Descendall 05:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Power to ya. Travb (talk) 06:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] COLOMBIAN FOREIGN RELATIONS
I think this template is missing the EU-Colombia relations. they have meadiated through out the process and has also intervened directly, as the case of France with Ingrid Betancourt and Germany with the spy Werner Mousse. I dont know if the irish can also be part of this. Spain has given military aid to colombia, and the EU in general. --F3rn4nd0 01:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Write the article, then add the link RWV 03:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
