Talk:Columbine conspiracy theories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In my opinion, the Columbine High School massacre article is getting too damn long. I would suggest moving all of the oddball rumors and speculation into this article; I was going to do it myself, but I wanted a consensus, first. 152.163.100.200 16:05, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] proper place for conspiracies to run free

trying to get a conspiracy based wiki up and running. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiconspiracy. check it out, add input. most of all help me get it running (I'm kinda amature over here)--Matt D 03:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Renaming this article

A proposal has ben put forward to require renaming of all articles that have the phrase "conspiracy theory" in their title, due to what proponents claim is the inherent POV of that phrase. Please see Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory. A vote is occurring at Wikipedia talk:Conspiracy theory. -Willmcw 05:47, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

I do not think this article is being neutral. I think that the second of the police cover up is slanted towards the CT.

"The fact that many religious persons still regard her as a martyr regardless of the historical reality is cited as further evidence of their disdain for the truth." Is the preceding sentence fact or editorial comment? The author appears to refer to a pre-Columbine distain for truth on the part of many religious persons. To which particular distain for truth is the author referring? To what other evidence supporting a distain for the truth is the author alluding, and what citations of distain for the truth is the author referencing?

[edit] Section Rename

I've renamed the first section from "brainwashing" to "influences" because brainwashing sounded quite extreme for most of the material in this section. Some of the material in here was also incorrectly sectioned, I doubt Al Gore was influencing them or brainwashing them in any way.--Sully 09:36, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Conspiracy?

Those saying these guys were influenced by certain music were not promoting a "conspiracy theory," even if some of their claims turned out wrong. Potential harmful influence from media/music has nothing to do with a "conspiracy. 134.69.166.38 04:35, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Conservatives?

Because, of course, Senator Hillary Clinton is at the forefront of Conservative thinkers.