Talk:Colleen Shannon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] the lawsuit
In re: the removal of information pertaining to the pending litigation over Playboy's use of a likeness of Colleen Shannon, from User talk:H Bruthzoo,
Good evening, while I agree that in the broad scope of things, a legal battle in which Colleen Shannon is not personally participating may seem trivial, however, 1) she is not a major celebrity and does not have any substantial news or acheivements to overshadow it, 2) it's not necessarily a battle for only $750, as nowhere is it indicated that that is the amount for which Playboy is being sued, and 3) if "trivia" pertaining to the details of her foot tattoo is viable for the article, I don't see how a federal lawsuit pertaining to her image could be considered too "trivial" for inclusion.
Perhaps it's something to be commented upon by a third party. I seek others' opinions on the talk page. LeSaint 06:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- I do have reliable sourcing on the matter. At what point is it deemed acceptable to revert the removal of the section? LeSaint 02:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)