Collectivist anarchism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- For the broad category of anarchism sometimes referred to as "collectivist anarchism," see social anarchism.
| Part of the Politics series on |
 |
| Schools of thought |
|---|
|
Black • Capitalist |
| Anarchism in culture |
|
Religion • Society • Arts |
| Anarchist theory |
|
Origins • Economics |
| Anarchism by region |
|
Africa • Austria • China |
| Anarchism lists |
| Anarchism Portal Politics Portal · |
Collectivist anarchism is a doctrine spearheaded by Michael Bakunin that advocated the abolition of the state and private ownership of the means of production, with the means of production instead being owned collectively and controlled and managed by the producers themselves. Workers would be be paid a wage based of the amount of time they contributed to production. These wages would be used to purchase commodities in a communal market.[1] This contrasts with anarcho-communism where wages and trade would be abolished, and where individuals would take freely from a storehouse of goods "to each according to his need." Thus, Bakunin's "Collectivist Anarchism," notwithstanding the title, is seen as a blend of individualism and collectivism.[2] (Note: Here the term "individualism" is referring to private ownership, in the sense of workers owning their own tools of labor and productive property, and "collectivism" is referring to collective ownership of land.) Collectivist anarchism is most commonly associated with Mikhail Bakunin, the anti-authoritarian sections of the First International, and the early Spanish anarchist movement. Other prominent proponents of collectivist anarchism included the German anarchist Johann Most before he became an anarchist communist. Today many collectivist anarchists are anarcho-syndicalist in organizational structure.
The collectivist anarchists at first used the term "collectivism" to distinguish themselves from the mutualism of the followers of Proudhon and the State socialists associated with Karl Marx. In the name of liberty, Bakunin wrote, "we shall always protest against anything that may in any way resemble communism or state socialism," which Bakunin regarded as fundamentally authoritarian ("Federalism, Socialism, and Anti-Theologism," 1867).[1]
Contents |
[edit] The First International
The anti-authoritarian sections of the First International proclaimed at the St. Imier Congress (1872) that "the aspirations of the proletariat can have no purpose other than the establishment of an absolutely free economic organization and federation, founded upon the labour and equality of all and absolutely independent of all political government," in which each worker will have the "right to the enjoyment of the gross product of his labours and thereby the means of developing his full intellectual, material and moral powers in a collective setting." This revolutionary transformation could "only be the outcome of the spontaneous action of the proletariat itself, its trades bodies and the autonomous communes."[2] A similar position was adopted by the Workers' Federation of the Spanish Region in 1882, as articulated by an anarchist veteran of the First International, Jose Llunas Pujols, in his essay, "Collectivism."[3]
By the early 1880s, most of the European anarchist movement had adopted an anarchist communist position, advocating the abolition of wage labour and distribution according to need. Ironically, the "collectivist" label then became more commonly associated with Marxist state socialists who advocated the retention of some sort of wage system during the transition to full communism. The anarchist communist, Peter Kropotkin, attacked this position in his essay, "The Collectivist Wages System", which was reprinted in his book The Conquest of Bread in 1892.
[edit] Theory
The difference between Collectivist Anarchism and anarcho-communism is that under anarchist collectivism, the means of production were to be socialized, but a wage system was retained based on the amount of labor performed. Anarchist communism also called for the socialization of production but also of the distribution of goods. Instead of 'to each according to his labor', in anarcho-communism the community would supply the subsistence requirements to each member free of charge according to the maxim 'to each according to his needs'.[3]
The difference between Collectivist Anarchism and Anarcho-Communism is that collectivist anarchism stresses collective ownership of productive, subsistence and distributory property, while communist anarchism negates the concept of ownership in favor of usage or possession. [4] [5] Communist Anarchists believe that subsistence, productive and distributive property should be common or social possessions while personal property should be private possessions. [6] Collectivist anarchists such as Mikhail Bakunin believe in remuneration of labor which communist-anarchists such as Peter Kropotkin believed that such remuneration would lead to the recreation of currency and that such would need a State. [7] Thus, it could be said that collectivist anarchists believe in freedom through collective ownership of production while communist anarchists believe in freedom through non-ownership of production in favor of free usership of such by anyone to satisfy their needs and wants. [8]
Collectivist Anarchists are not opposed to the use of currency and some (such as Participatory Economists) hold such systems as permanent rather than carryover to communist anarchism.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Bakunin Mikail. Bakunin on Anarchism. Black Rose Books. 1980. p. 369
- ^ Morriss, Brian. Bakukunin: The Philosophy of Freedom. Black Rose Books Ltd., 1993. p. 115
- ^ This paragraph sourced by Shatz, Marshall; Guess, Raymond; Skinner, Quentin. The Conquest of Bread and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press. p. xvi
- ^ Proudhon. What is Property, pp. 395-6
- ^ Berkman, Alexander. The ABC of Anarchism, p. 68
- ^ What is Anarchism?, p. 217
- ^ Kropotkin. Kropotkin's Revolutionary Pamphlets, p. 162
- ^ Emma Goldman. Red Emma Speaks, p. 53 and p. 54
