Talk:Cogito (software)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advertisement? You think so? I don't even use cogito, just tried to explain why it exists: it has slightly different design goals than core git. (I think it basically achieves them, but that's a value judgement.)

I don't want to get into an edit war, but don't think the annotation is justified. Perhaps you can explain in more detail, or a third person can review the matter and judge whether to delete it?

[edit] Comments

Saw this comment added on RC, just popping in to give some feedback. There are some minor proplems with the text as it stands, such as:

• "tries to be friendlier" [...] "and more familiar" Both vague and uncited. To keep them in, it needs to say *who* said this, e.g. "the author's goal was for Cognito to be "quote from author"
• "keep the Git advantages" - better to list what it can and can't do as simple bullet points, which leaves judgements out of it.

That said, what else can be said about it? Unless there's a lot more you can envisage adding, I'd suggest merging it into another article, or just leaving as an item under List_of_revision_control_software If it's always going to remain as a stub, probably best to delete it. MartinRe 10:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)