User talk:Clockwork Apricot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Half-Life 2: Episode 4, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Half-Life 2: Episode 4. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Thunderbrand 01:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Talk:Torchwood

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Talk:Torchwood. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. — Nathan (talk) / 23:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:TheInfiniteQuest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheInfiniteQuest.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Zampano.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zampano.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Human Nature

Please use the move function, instead of copy-and-paste, when renaming a page. This avoids splitting the page history in several places. In addition, the title "Human Nature" has not been officially confirmed for the upcoming television story based on the novel, so moving Human Nature (Doctor Who) to Human Nature (Doctor Who novel) is premature. If the title is confirmed by the BBC, it will be fine to move the page — but please use the move tab instead of cutting and pasting. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I have redirected Human Nature (Doctor Who novel) to Human Nature (Doctor Who) as further disambiguation is not required. The links to Human Nature (Doctor Who) which you have redirected to the 'novel' page have been reversed. Please do not redirect any more of these links. (Incidentally, another page, entitled Human Nature (Doctor Who episode) and created by User:Coleberg, has been also been redirected by Josiah to the List of Doctor Who serials as the episode's title is currently unconfirmed.) Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Silver Nemesis 18:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
In hindsight, I should have done a little research on whether the title was actually confirmed or not first. At least when it is confirmed, we'll have the page ready! Clockwork Apricot 22:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Turns out you were only a few days early! I'm fixing the relevant links. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Doctor Who serials

I'm desperately trying to avoid breaking WP:3RR here!

According to the press release at Outpost Gallifrey (click here), 'three new episode titles' will be revealed in DWM issue 380. As this isn't officially on sale until 1 March 2007, please refrain from adding links and/or articles for Blink (Doctor Who), The Sound of Drums (Doctor Who), Human Nature (Doctor Who episode) (the latter two currently redirect to List of Doctor Who serials) or any similar titles. Silver Nemesis 17:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

As the press release at Outpost Gallifrey (click here) states, DWM issue 380 will be released on 1 March. Unless you can find a reputable source that can tell me that subscribers recieve the magazine early, YES, you have to wait until Thursday. Silver Nemesis 17:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Please don't fill my talk page with external links. It's very, very annoying. (Tip: if possible, try and edit all in one go, not several times.)
Within the last half-hour, it appears that the episode titles have been confirmed by a reputable source at Outpost Gallifrey (click here). Forum posts are NOT reputable sources. With regards to Human Nature, several major changes need to be made to existing pages which can only be carried out by an admin. I will request for this to be done. Silver Nemesis 18:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/l/o/User_talk%7EClockwork_Apricot_d943.html"