Clovis culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Clovis culture (also Llano culture) is a prehistoric Native American culture that first appears in the archaeological record of North America around 11,000 years ago, at the end of the last ice age.

The culture is named for artifacts found near Clovis, New Mexico. Clovis sites have since been identified throughout all of the contiguous United States, as well as Mexico and Central America.

The Clovis people, also known as Paleo-Indians, were generally regarded as the first human inhabitants of the New World, and ancestors of all the indigenous cultures of North and South America. However, this view has been contested over the last thirty years by various archaeological finds which are claimed to be much older. (See: Monte Verde)

Contents

[edit] Description

A hallmark of Clovis culture is the use of a distinctively-shaped fluted rock spear point, known as the Clovis point. The Clovis point is distinctively bifacial and fluted on both sides, a feature that possibly allowed the point to be mounted onto a spear in a way so that the point would snap off on impact. Archaeologists do not agree on whether the widespread presence of these artifacts indicates the proliferation of a single people, or the adoption of a superior technology by non-Clovis people. It is generally accepted that Clovis people hunted mammoth: sites abound where Clovis points are found mixed in with mammoth remains. Yet this is only part of the Clovis story. More than 125 species of plants and animals are known to have been used by Clovis People throughout the Western Hemisphere. Whether they drove the mammoth, and other species, to extinction via overhunting--the so-called Pleistocene overkill hypothesis--is still an open, and controversial, question. The greater likelihood is that a combination of climate change, human predation, disease, and additional pressures from newly arrived herbivores (competition) and carnivores (predation)isolated populations and made it impossible for them to reproduce and survive.

[edit] Discovery

A cowboy and former slave, George McJunkin, found an Ancient Bison (an extinct relative of the buffalo, not a mammoth) skeleton with an associated Folsom point. It was first excavated in 1926, near Folsom, New Mexico. In 1929, 19-year-old James Ridgley Whiteman, discovered the Clovis Man Site in the Blackwater Draw in Eastern New Mexico. Despite earlier discoveries, the first accepted evidence of this tool complex was excavated in 1932 in Clovis, New Mexico, by a crew under the direction of Edgar Billings Howard from the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences/University of Pennsylvania. Howard's crew left their excavation in Burnet Cave, NM (truly the first professionally excavated Clovis site) in August and visited Whiteman and his Blackwater Draw site. In November, Howard was back at Blackwater Draw to investigate additional finds by Whiteman.

There may be earlier reports of the dig at Burnet Cave, but it seems likely that the first report of professional work at a Clovis site concerns the Blackwater Draw site in the November 25, 1932 issue of Science. This directly contradicts statements by some authors (Haynes 2002:56 The Early Settlement of North America) that Dent, Colorado was the first excavated Clovis site.

[edit] Were the Clovis people the first Americans?

Until recently, the standard theory among archaeologists (known as Clovis First) was that the Clovis people were the first inhabitants of the Americas. The primary support of the theory was that no solid evidence of pre-Clovis human inhabitation had been found. According to the standard accepted theory, the Clovis people crossed the Beringia land bridge over the Bering Strait from Siberia to Alaska during the period of lowered sea levels during the ice age, then made their way southward through an ice-free corridor east of the Rocky Mountains in present-day western Canada as the glaciers retreated.

New evidence, however, indicates the Clovis people may not have been the first people in the Americas. According to the Texas A&M university, new radiocarbon dates show they couldn't have spread throughout the two continents in such a short time.[1]

[edit] Alternative theories

[edit] Pre-Clovis sites

Many Archaeologists have long debated the possible existence of a culture older than Clovis in North and South America. Archaeologists working at these sites have identified and dated certain artifacts as pre-Clovis, but some of these claims have been disputed by other archaeologists.

  • One such site, Monte Verde in Chile, appear to have remains from before Clovis mixed with technology similar to Clovis.
  • Another candidate for a pre-Clovis site is Topper in South Carolina, where in 2004 there were found worked stone tools that have been dated by radiocarbon techniques to 50,000 years ago, although there is currently significant dispute regarding these dates.
  • A possible pre-Clovis site is located at Cactus Hill in southern Virginia.
  • A site in southwestern Missouri, the Big Eddy Site, is generating a lot of interest and has several possible pre-clovis artifacts. In situ artifacts have been found in this well stratified site in association with charcoal. Five different samples have been AMS dated to between 11,300 BP to 12,675 BP.
  • Finally, a site with stone tools, alleged to be from 13,000 to 15,000 years old based on surrounding geology, was discovered in Walker, Minnesota in 2006. [1]

[edit] Coastal migration route

Recent studies of the mitochondrial DNA of First Nations/Native Americans suggests that the people of the New World may have diverged genetically from Siberians as early as 20,000 years ago, far earlier than the standard theory would suggest. According to one alternative theory, the Pacific coast of North America may have been free of ice such as to allow the first peoples in North America to come down this route prior to the formation of the ice-free corridor in the continental interior. No solid evidence has yet been found to support this hypothesis except that genetic analysis of coastal marine life indicate diverse fauna persisting in refugia throughout the Pleistocene ice ages along the coasts of Alaska and British Columbia; these refugia include common food sources of coastal aboriginal peoples, suggesting that a migration along the coastline was feasible at the time.

[edit] Solutrean hypothesis

The controversial Solutrean hypothesis proposed in 1999 by Smithsonian archaeologist Dennis Stanford and colleague Bruce Bradley (Stanford and Bradley 2002), suggests that the Clovis people could have inherited technology from the Solutrean people who lived in southern Europe between about 21,000-17,000 years ago, and who created the first Stone Age artwork in present-day southern France. The link is suggested by the similarity in technology between the spear points of the Solutreans and those of the Clovis people. Such a theory would require that the Solutreans crossed via the edge of the pack ice in the North Atlantic Ocean that then extended to the Atlantic coast of France. They could have done this using survival skills similar to those of the modern Inuit people. Supporters of this hypothesis suggest that stone tools found at Cactus Hill (an early American site in Virginia), that are knapped in a style between Clovis and Solutrean, support a possible link between the Clovis people and Solutrean people in Europe. The idea is also supported by mitochondrial DNA analysis (see Map in Single-origin hypothesis) which has found that some members of some native North American tribes have a maternal ancestry (called haplogroup X) (Schurr 2000), which appears to be more closely linked to the maternal ancestors of some present day individuals in Europe and western Asia than to the ancestors of any present-day individuals in eastern Asia.

Opponents of the hypothesis that the Solutreans crossed the Atlantic point to the difficulty of the ocean crossing, as well as the lack of art work (such as that found at Lascaux in France) among the Clovis people, as indicative that no such link exists. Significantly, there is also a 5,000 radiocarbon year time difference between the Solutrean of France and the Clovis of the New World, and there are no archaeological sites in Europe north of Paris to have been the origin of the alleged Solutrean populations who crossed the Atlantic to become the Clovis (Straus 2000). However, evidence suggests that canoes built previous to 9500 BC have been found.[citation needed]

[edit] References

  • Dixon, E. James 1999 Bones Boats and Bison: The Early Archeology of Western North America. University of New Mexico Press.
  • Schurr, Theodore G. (2000). "Mitochondrial DNA and the Peopling of the New World". American Scientist (88(3)): 246-253. 
  • Stanford, Dennis, and Bruce Bradley. 2002. "Ocean Trails and Prairie Paths? Thoughts About Clovis Origins." In The First Americans: The Pleistocene Colonization of the New World, Nina G. Jablonski (ed.), pp. 255-271. San Francisco: Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, No. 27.
  • Straus, Lawrence G. (2000). "Solutrean Settlement of North America? A Review of Reality". American Antiquity (63): 7-20. 

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ A&M University Press Article

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../c/l/o/Clovis_culture.html"