User talk:Cleared as filed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Premature/Out-of-Context Advertisement-Flagging

Hey there Cleared as Filed...JustinManger4382 here. I submitted an article about the company "Obopay," and would like to take strong issue with the advertising flag you placed on it.

As I have already clarified on Obopay's Talk Page, that article reflects the whole of ALL reference-able information available ANYWHERE on the company up to now...good or bad. The contextual/real-world fact of the matter is that Obopay is a fledgling company, and that all of the cite-able information about them is in the form of press releases or third-party articles that do nothing more than simply echo what the press releases say. I tried to describe the service as accurately and concisely as possible, and quite frankly the article is inarguably and simply a wrote description of what the company has done so far up to now. I understand and appreciate Wikipedia's standards of neutrality, but you're wrong for flagging it as an advertisement: if I used all of the cite-able information I could find (and the article WAS heavily researched/referenced), how can you logically put such a flag on it? I wrote the article to describe the service and what the company have done...not as some puff piece.

Please explain to me SPECIFICALLY what induced you to put that flag on the article (i.e. specifically what sentences/words/etc...the details). If you really feel you must flag the article, could you please use something other than "advertisement" (I stress that it is NOT intended to be an advertisement, nor is it realistically written as such).

Please respond. I will take a non-response from you on the article's talk page as an admission of incorrectness on your part, and will remove the flag myself (but will certainly wait a few days for a response). JustinManger4382 20:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)JustinManger4382JustinManger4382 20:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moshassuck River

Hi. I updated the Moshassuck River article to pretty it up a bit and added quite a bit to the history. Just figured I'd give you a heads up. Cheers! --Analogdemon (talk) 03:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Cool — it looks pretty good. —Cleared as filed. 04:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)